AMBA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Analog Devices has a net margin of -24.08% compared to Ambarella's net margin of 16.15%. Ambarella's return on equity of -21.08% beat Analog Devices's return on equity of 4.44%.

Ambarella has a consensus price target of $93.64, signalling upside risk potential of 77.71%. On the other hand Analog Devices has an analysts' consensus of $260.58 which suggests that it could grow by 24.72%. Given that Ambarella has higher upside potential than Analog Devices, analysts believe Ambarella is more attractive than Analog Devices.

Ambarella has a beta of 1.781, which suggesting that the stock is 78.077% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Analog Devices has a beta of 1.072, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.214%.

Ambarella has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Analog Devices offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Ambarella pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Analog Devices pays out 109.8% of its earnings as a dividend.

Ambarella quarterly revenues are $84M, which are smaller than Analog Devices quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Ambarella's net income of -$20.2M is lower than Analog Devices's net income of $391.3M. Notably, Ambarella's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Analog Devices's PE ratio is 66.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ambarella is 7.64x versus 11.16x for Analog Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Applied Materials has a net margin of -24.08% compared to Ambarella's net margin of 16.54%. Ambarella's return on equity of -21.08% beat Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44%.

Ambarella has a consensus price target of $93.64, signalling upside risk potential of 77.71%. On the other hand Applied Materials has an analysts' consensus of $206.3200 which suggests that it could grow by 39.71%. Given that Ambarella has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe Ambarella is more attractive than Applied Materials.

Ambarella has a beta of 1.781, which suggesting that the stock is 78.077% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Applied Materials has a beta of 1.625, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.488%.

Ambarella has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Applied Materials offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Ambarella pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials pays out 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ambarella quarterly revenues are $84M, which are smaller than Applied Materials quarterly revenues of $7.2B. Ambarella's net income of -$20.2M is lower than Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Ambarella's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Applied Materials's PE ratio is 19.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ambarella is 7.64x versus 4.43x for Applied Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of -24.08% compared to Ambarella's net margin of -0.88%. Ambarella's return on equity of -21.08% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.02%.

Ambarella has a consensus price target of $93.64, signalling upside risk potential of 77.71%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $22.90 which suggests that it could fall by -3.06%. Given that Ambarella has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Ambarella is more attractive than Intel.

Ambarella has a beta of 1.781, which suggesting that the stock is 78.077% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.678%.

Ambarella has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intel offers a yield of 2.12% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Ambarella pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

Ambarella quarterly revenues are $84M, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $14.3B. Ambarella's net income of -$20.2M is higher than Intel's net income of -$126M. Notably, Ambarella's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ambarella is 7.64x versus 1.90x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -24.08% compared to Ambarella's net margin of 56.17%. Ambarella's return on equity of -21.08% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Ambarella has a consensus price target of $93.64, signalling upside risk potential of 77.71%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $171.01 which suggests that it could grow by 53.47%. Given that Ambarella has higher upside potential than NVIDIA, analysts believe Ambarella is more attractive than NVIDIA.

Ambarella has a beta of 1.781, which suggesting that the stock is 78.077% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.766, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.633%.

Ambarella has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Ambarella pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ambarella quarterly revenues are $84M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Ambarella's net income of -$20.2M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Ambarella's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 37.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ambarella is 7.64x versus 21.18x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.