INTC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Intel's net margin of 6.29%. Intel's return on equity of -17.02% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 2.9%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $22.90, signalling downside risk potential of -5.38%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $146.28 which suggests that it could grow by 27.41%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than Intel.

Intel has a beta of 1.027, which suggesting that the stock is 2.678% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.739, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.869%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Intel quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are larger than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Intel's net income of -$126M is lower than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $482M. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 115.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.95x versus 7.29x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Intel's net margin of 11.02%. Intel's return on equity of -17.02% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $22.90, signalling downside risk potential of -5.38%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $112.79 which suggests that it could grow by 57.38%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Intel.

Intel has a beta of 1.027, which suggesting that the stock is 2.678% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.435%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Intel quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Intel's net income of -$126M is lower than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.95x versus 10.76x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Intel's net margin of 19.66%. Intel's return on equity of -17.02% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 10.22%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $22.90, signalling downside risk potential of -5.38%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $129.07 which suggests that it could grow by 38.11%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than Intel.

Intel has a beta of 1.027, which suggesting that the stock is 2.678% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.227, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.652%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intel quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are larger than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.1B. Intel's net income of -$126M is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.6B. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 22.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.95x versus 3.40x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -0.88% compared to Intel's net margin of 56.17%. Intel's return on equity of -17.02% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

Intel has a consensus price target of $22.90, signalling downside risk potential of -5.38%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $171.01 which suggests that it could grow by 41.7%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Intel.

Intel has a beta of 1.027, which suggesting that the stock is 2.678% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.766, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.633%.

Intel has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Intel pays -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Intel quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. Intel's net income of -$126M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, Intel's price-to-earnings ratio is 95.83x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 41.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Intel is 1.95x versus 22.94x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.