ADI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel has a net margin of 16.15% compared to Analog Devices's net margin of -6.48%. Analog Devices's return on equity of 4.44% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.53%.

Analog Devices has a consensus price target of $245.23, signalling upside risk potential of 26.02%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $21.85 which suggests that it could grow by 8.98%. Given that Analog Devices has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Analog Devices is more attractive than Intel.

Analog Devices has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.655% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.129, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.94%.

Analog Devices has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.93%. Intel offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Analog Devices pays 109.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

Analog Devices quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $12.7B. Analog Devices's net income of $391.3M is higher than Intel's net income of -$821M. Notably, Analog Devices's price-to-earnings ratio is 61.97x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Analog Devices is 10.39x versus 1.63x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 16.15% compared to Analog Devices's net margin of 26.8%. Analog Devices's return on equity of 4.44% beat KLA's return on equity of 96.34%.

Analog Devices has a consensus price target of $245.23, signalling upside risk potential of 26.02%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $794.97 which suggests that it could grow by 14.45%. Given that Analog Devices has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Analog Devices is more attractive than KLA.

Analog Devices has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.655% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.370, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.998%.

Analog Devices has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.93%. KLA offers a yield of 0.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Analog Devices pays 109.8% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Analog Devices's is not.

Analog Devices quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are smaller than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Analog Devices's net income of $391.3M is lower than KLA's net income of $824.5M. Notably, Analog Devices's price-to-earnings ratio is 61.97x while KLA's PE ratio is 29.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Analog Devices is 10.39x versus 8.65x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microchip Technology has a net margin of 16.15% compared to Analog Devices's net margin of -5.22%. Analog Devices's return on equity of 4.44% beat Microchip Technology's return on equity of 4.76%.

Analog Devices has a consensus price target of $245.23, signalling upside risk potential of 26.02%. On the other hand Microchip Technology has an analysts' consensus of $59.48 which suggests that it could grow by 26.84%. Given that Microchip Technology has higher upside potential than Analog Devices, analysts believe Microchip Technology is more attractive than Analog Devices.

Analog Devices has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.655% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microchip Technology has a beta of 1.513, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.332%.

Analog Devices has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.93%. Microchip Technology offers a yield of 3.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Analog Devices pays 109.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology pays out 47.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Analog Devices's is not.

Analog Devices quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Microchip Technology quarterly revenues of $1B. Analog Devices's net income of $391.3M is higher than Microchip Technology's net income of -$53.6M. Notably, Analog Devices's price-to-earnings ratio is 61.97x while Microchip Technology's PE ratio is 83.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Analog Devices is 10.39x versus 5.34x for Microchip Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 16.15% compared to Analog Devices's net margin of 11.02%. Analog Devices's return on equity of 4.44% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Analog Devices has a consensus price target of $245.23, signalling upside risk potential of 26.02%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $103.36 which suggests that it could grow by 75.42%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Analog Devices, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Analog Devices.

Analog Devices has a beta of 1.057, which suggesting that the stock is 5.655% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.781, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 78.133%.

Analog Devices has a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.93%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Analog Devices pays 109.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend.

Analog Devices quarterly revenues are $2.4B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Analog Devices's net income of $391.3M is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Analog Devices's price-to-earnings ratio is 61.97x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Analog Devices is 10.39x versus 8.84x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.