KLAC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 26.8% compared to KLA's net margin of 6.29%. KLA's return on equity of 96.34% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 2.9%.

KLA has a consensus price target of $819.68, signalling upside risk potential of 20.28%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $147.87 which suggests that it could grow by 50.72%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than KLA.

KLA has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.786% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.739, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.869%.

KLA has a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. KLA pays 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KLA quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.7B. KLA's net income of $824.5M is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $482M. Notably, KLA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.66x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 99.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLA is 8.48x versus 6.23x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Broadcom has a net margin of 26.8% compared to KLA's net margin of 36.89%. KLA's return on equity of 96.34% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 14.67%.

KLA has a consensus price target of $819.68, signalling upside risk potential of 20.28%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $250.17 which suggests that it could grow by 30.73%. Given that Broadcom has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Broadcom is more attractive than KLA.

KLA has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.786% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.69399999999999%.

KLA has a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. Broadcom offers a yield of 1.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. KLA pays 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Broadcom's is not.

KLA quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.9B. KLA's net income of $824.5M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5.5B. Notably, KLA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.66x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 91.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLA is 8.48x versus 16.78x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 26.8% compared to KLA's net margin of 11.02%. KLA's return on equity of 96.34% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

KLA has a consensus price target of $819.68, signalling upside risk potential of 20.28%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $113.96 which suggests that it could grow by 65.73%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than KLA.

KLA has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.786% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.435%.

KLA has a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. KLA pays 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KLA quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. KLA's net income of $824.5M is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, KLA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.66x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLA is 8.48x versus 10.32x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 26.8% compared to KLA's net margin of 56.17%. KLA's return on equity of 96.34% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

KLA has a consensus price target of $819.68, signalling upside risk potential of 20.28%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.50 which suggests that it could grow by 49.25%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than KLA.

KLA has a beta of 1.298, which suggesting that the stock is 29.786% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.581, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.058%.

KLA has a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.92%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.04% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. KLA pays 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

KLA quarterly revenues are $3.1B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. KLA's net income of $824.5M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, KLA's price-to-earnings ratio is 28.66x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 39.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KLA is 8.48x versus 21.97x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.