AMAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Intel has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of -0.88%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.02%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $206.0170, signalling upside risk potential of 37.39%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $22.90 which suggests that it could fall by -3.38%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Intel.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.625, which suggesting that the stock is 62.488% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.678%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Intel offers a yield of 2.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $14.3B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is higher than Intel's net income of -$126M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.60x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.50x versus 1.91x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 26.8%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat KLA's return on equity of 96.34%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $206.0170, signalling upside risk potential of 37.39%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $819.68 which suggests that it could grow by 20.28%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than KLA.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.625, which suggesting that the stock is 62.488% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.786%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. KLA offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is higher than KLA's net income of $824.5M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.60x while KLA's PE ratio is 28.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.50x versus 8.48x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 11.02%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $206.0170, signalling upside risk potential of 37.39%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $113.96 which suggests that it could grow by 65.73%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Applied Materials.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.625, which suggesting that the stock is 62.488% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.435%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.60x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.50x versus 10.32x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Micron Technology has a net margin of 16.54% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 21.47%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 34.44% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 8.71%.

Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $206.0170, signalling upside risk potential of 37.39%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $129.04 which suggests that it could grow by 36.01%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Micron Technology, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Micron Technology.

Applied Materials has a beta of 1.625, which suggesting that the stock is 62.488% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.227, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.652%.

Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.07%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7.2B, which are smaller than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.7B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.2B is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.60x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 27.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 4.50x versus 3.68x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.