Financhill
Sell
43

AMAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$180.3600
Seasonality move :
11.99%
Day range:
$180.0612 - $186.4400
52-week range:
$158.9580 - $255.8900
Dividend yield:
0.84%
P/E ratio:
20.95x
P/S ratio:
5.54x
P/B ratio:
7.72x
Volume:
5.6M
Avg. volume:
6.6M
1-year change:
9.77%
Market cap:
$146.7B
Revenue:
$27.2B
EPS (TTM):
$8.61

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
AMAT
Applied Materials
$7.2B $2.30 6.9% -4% $210.8594
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
$7.5B $1.07 28.21% 1257.44% $169.82
INTC
Intel
$12.8B $0.06 0.43% -81.02% $22.46
KLAC
KLA
$3B $7.93 22.31% 68.79% $819.95
MU
Micron Technology
$8.6B $1.60 36.19% 104.37% $130.56
NVDA
NVIDIA
$42B $0.91 72.49% 71.57% $174.04
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
AMAT
Applied Materials
$180.3500 $210.8594 $146.7B 20.95x $0.40 0.84% 5.54x
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
$115.95 $169.82 $188.2B 104.46x $0.00 0% 7.80x
INTC
Intel
$19.43 $22.46 $84.1B 95.83x $0.13 2.57% 1.57x
KLAC
KLA
$738.24 $819.95 $98.1B 31.04x $1.70 0.82% 9.19x
MU
Micron Technology
$91.24 $130.56 $101.7B 26.29x $0.12 0.5% 3.54x
NVDA
NVIDIA
$120.07 $174.04 $2.9T 47.25x $0.01 0.03% 26.36x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
AMAT
Applied Materials
24.78% 1.922 4.43% 1.75x
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
2.93% 1.958 0.65% 1.58x
INTC
Intel
33.5% 3.130 54.02% 0.72x
KLAC
KLA
62.14% 1.525 7.02% 1.51x
MU
Micron Technology
19.46% 1.921 10.36% 1.67x
NVDA
NVIDIA
11.38% 2.251 0.26% 3.41x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
AMAT
Applied Materials
$3.3B $2B 30.15% 39.95% 27.84% $2.2B
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices
$3.4B $724M 3.13% 3.25% 11.15% $496M
INTC
Intel
$5.6B $469M -11.64% -17.02% 5.84% -$2.7B
KLAC
KLA
$1.9B $1.2B 33.2% 96.34% 34.05% $757.2M
MU
Micron Technology
$3.3B $2.2B 6.91% 8.71% 26.07% $38M
NVDA
NVIDIA
$26.2B $21.9B 106.73% 126.43% 63.79% $16.8B

Applied Materials vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or AMD?

    Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 11.31%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 39.95% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 3.25%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    47.34% $2.09 $25.3B
    AMD
    Advanced Micro Devices
    50.14% $0.47 $58.7B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or AMD?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $210.8594, signalling upside risk potential of 16.92%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $169.82 which suggests that it could grow by 46.46%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than Applied Materials.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    20 11 1
    AMD
    Advanced Micro Devices
    27 15 1
  • Is AMAT or AMD More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.527, which suggesting that the stock is 52.741% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.655, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.485%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or AMD?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or AMD?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7B, which are larger than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $6.8B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.7B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $771M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.95x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 104.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.54x versus 7.80x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    5.54x 20.95x $7B $1.7B
    AMD
    Advanced Micro Devices
    7.80x 104.46x $6.8B $771M
  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or INTC?

    Intel has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of -0.88%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 39.95% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.02%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    47.34% $2.09 $25.3B
    INTC
    Intel
    39.16% -$0.03 $155B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or INTC?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $210.8594, signalling upside risk potential of 16.92%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $22.46 which suggests that it could grow by 15.6%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than Intel.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    20 11 1
    INTC
    Intel
    4 37 1
  • Is AMAT or INTC More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.527, which suggesting that the stock is 52.741% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.081, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.1%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or INTC?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Intel offers a yield of 2.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Applied Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or INTC?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $14.3B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.7B is higher than Intel's net income of -$126M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.95x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.54x versus 1.57x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    5.54x 20.95x $7B $1.7B
    INTC
    Intel
    1.57x 95.83x $14.3B -$126M
  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or KLAC?

    KLA has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 26.8%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 39.95% beat KLA's return on equity of 96.34%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    47.34% $2.09 $25.3B
    KLAC
    KLA
    60.3% $6.16 $9.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or KLAC?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $210.8594, signalling upside risk potential of 16.92%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $819.95 which suggests that it could grow by 9.06%. Given that Applied Materials has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Applied Materials is more attractive than KLA.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    20 11 1
    KLAC
    KLA
    12 10 0
  • Is AMAT or KLAC More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.527, which suggesting that the stock is 52.741% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.277, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.693%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or KLAC?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. KLA offers a yield of 0.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or KLAC?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.7B is higher than KLA's net income of $824.5M. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.95x while KLA's PE ratio is 31.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.54x versus 9.19x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    5.54x 20.95x $7B $1.7B
    KLAC
    KLA
    9.19x 31.04x $3.1B $824.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or MU?

    Micron Technology has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 21.47%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 39.95% beat Micron Technology's return on equity of 8.71%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    47.34% $2.09 $25.3B
    MU
    Micron Technology
    38.44% $1.67 $58.1B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or MU?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $210.8594, signalling upside risk potential of 16.92%. On the other hand Micron Technology has an analysts' consensus of $130.56 which suggests that it could grow by 43.09%. Given that Micron Technology has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe Micron Technology is more attractive than Applied Materials.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    20 11 1
    MU
    Micron Technology
    25 5 0
  • Is AMAT or MU More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.527, which suggesting that the stock is 52.741% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Micron Technology has a beta of 1.179, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.944%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or MU?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. Micron Technology offers a yield of 0.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. Micron Technology pays out 65.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or MU?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7B, which are smaller than Micron Technology quarterly revenues of $8.7B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.7B is lower than Micron Technology's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.95x while Micron Technology's PE ratio is 26.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.54x versus 3.54x for Micron Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    5.54x 20.95x $7B $1.7B
    MU
    Micron Technology
    3.54x 26.29x $8.7B $1.9B
  • Which has Higher Returns AMAT or NVDA?

    NVIDIA has a net margin of 24.57% compared to Applied Materials's net margin of 55.04%. Applied Materials's return on equity of 39.95% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    47.34% $2.09 $25.3B
    NVDA
    NVIDIA
    74.56% $0.78 $74.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About AMAT or NVDA?

    Applied Materials has a consensus price target of $210.8594, signalling upside risk potential of 16.92%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $174.04 which suggests that it could grow by 44.95%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than Applied Materials, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than Applied Materials.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    20 11 1
    NVDA
    NVIDIA
    47 4 0
  • Is AMAT or NVDA More Risky?

    Applied Materials has a beta of 1.527, which suggesting that the stock is 52.741% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.622, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.23%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock AMAT or NVDA?

    Applied Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.84%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Applied Materials pays 16.61% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios AMAT or NVDA?

    Applied Materials quarterly revenues are $7B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. Applied Materials's net income of $1.7B is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, Applied Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 20.95x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 47.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Applied Materials is 5.54x versus 26.36x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    AMAT
    Applied Materials
    5.54x 20.95x $7B $1.7B
    NVDA
    NVIDIA
    26.36x 47.25x $35.1B $19.3B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Is Intuitive Surgical Stock Surging?
Why Is Intuitive Surgical Stock Surging?

Surgeries are scary for lots of reasons, not least because…

Why Did Stanley Druckenmiller Buy ARS Pharmaceuticals?
Why Did Stanley Druckenmiller Buy ARS Pharmaceuticals?

Billionaire Stanley Druckenmiller has been making large changes to his…

Is CVS Health Stock Undervalued?
Is CVS Health Stock Undervalued?

CVS Health (NYSE:CVS) share price declined by over 23% over…

Stock Ideas

Buy
61
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.5T
P/E Ratio: 39x

Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.1T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Sell
38
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 101x

Alerts

Buy
54
DECK alert for Feb 1

Deckers Outdoor [DECK] is down 20.35% over the past day.

Sell
49
EXOD alert for Feb 1

Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 18.88% over the past day.

Buy
69
HZO alert for Feb 1

MarineMax [HZO] is down 0.13% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock