VMC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MP Materials has a net margin of 10.36% compared to Vulcan Materials's net margin of -40.55%. Vulcan Materials's return on equity of 11.1% beat MP Materials's return on equity of -4.9%.

Vulcan Materials has a consensus price target of $293.24, signalling upside risk potential of 11.55%. On the other hand MP Materials has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 41.75%. Given that MP Materials has higher upside potential than Vulcan Materials, analysts believe MP Materials is more attractive than Vulcan Materials.

Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.836% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MP Materials has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Vulcan Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.7%. MP Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vulcan Materials pays 24.48% of its earnings as a dividend. MP Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vulcan Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vulcan Materials quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than MP Materials quarterly revenues of $62.9M. Vulcan Materials's net income of $207.6M is higher than MP Materials's net income of -$25.5M. Notably, Vulcan Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.46x while MP Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vulcan Materials is 4.73x versus 15.35x for MP Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NioCorp Developments has a net margin of 10.36% compared to Vulcan Materials's net margin of --. Vulcan Materials's return on equity of 11.1% beat NioCorp Developments's return on equity of --.

Vulcan Materials has a consensus price target of $293.24, signalling upside risk potential of 11.55%. On the other hand NioCorp Developments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 502.84%. Given that NioCorp Developments has higher upside potential than Vulcan Materials, analysts believe NioCorp Developments is more attractive than Vulcan Materials.

Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.836% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NioCorp Developments has a beta of 0.166, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 83.382%.

Vulcan Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.7%. NioCorp Developments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vulcan Materials pays 24.48% of its earnings as a dividend. NioCorp Developments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Vulcan Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vulcan Materials quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than NioCorp Developments quarterly revenues of --. Vulcan Materials's net income of $207.6M is higher than NioCorp Developments's net income of -$2.1M. Notably, Vulcan Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.46x while NioCorp Developments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vulcan Materials is 4.73x versus 4,371.70x for NioCorp Developments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Antimony has a net margin of 10.36% compared to Vulcan Materials's net margin of -30.05%. Vulcan Materials's return on equity of 11.1% beat United States Antimony's return on equity of -16.85%.

Vulcan Materials has a consensus price target of $293.24, signalling upside risk potential of 11.55%. On the other hand United States Antimony has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 27.69%. Given that United States Antimony has higher upside potential than Vulcan Materials, analysts believe United States Antimony is more attractive than Vulcan Materials.

Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.836% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Antimony has a beta of 0.913, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.678%.

Vulcan Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.7%. United States Antimony offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vulcan Materials pays 24.48% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Antimony pays out -12.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Vulcan Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vulcan Materials quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than United States Antimony quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Vulcan Materials's net income of $207.6M is higher than United States Antimony's net income of -$727.5K. Notably, Vulcan Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.46x while United States Antimony's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vulcan Materials is 4.73x versus 19.70x for United States Antimony. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Lime & Minerals has a net margin of 10.36% compared to Vulcan Materials's net margin of 37.3%. Vulcan Materials's return on equity of 11.1% beat United States Lime & Minerals's return on equity of 23.52%.

Vulcan Materials has a consensus price target of $293.24, signalling upside risk potential of 11.55%. On the other hand United States Lime & Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vulcan Materials has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, analysts believe Vulcan Materials is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals.

Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.812, which suggesting that the stock is 18.836% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.885, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.477%.

Vulcan Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.7%. United States Lime & Minerals offers a yield of 0.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Vulcan Materials pays 24.48% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals pays out 6.11% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Vulcan Materials quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than United States Lime & Minerals quarterly revenues of $89.4M. Vulcan Materials's net income of $207.6M is higher than United States Lime & Minerals's net income of $33.4M. Notably, Vulcan Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.46x while United States Lime & Minerals's PE ratio is 39.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vulcan Materials is 4.73x versus 12.76x for United States Lime & Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.