MLM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

NioCorp Developments has a net margin of 18.03% compared to Martin Marietta Materials's net margin of --. Martin Marietta Materials's return on equity of 22.49% beat NioCorp Developments's return on equity of --.

Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $606.78, signalling upside risk potential of 27.2%. On the other hand NioCorp Developments has an analysts' consensus of $3.63 which suggests that it could grow by 86.94%. Given that NioCorp Developments has higher upside potential than Martin Marietta Materials, analysts believe NioCorp Developments is more attractive than Martin Marietta Materials.

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.888, which suggesting that the stock is 11.24% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NioCorp Developments has a beta of 0.025, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.488%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. NioCorp Developments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Martin Marietta Materials pays 9.47% of its earnings as a dividend. NioCorp Developments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Martin Marietta Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Martin Marietta Materials quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than NioCorp Developments quarterly revenues of --. Martin Marietta Materials's net income of $294M is higher than NioCorp Developments's net income of -$450K. Notably, Martin Marietta Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.76x while NioCorp Developments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Martin Marietta Materials is 4.50x versus 4,225.63x for NioCorp Developments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Antimony has a net margin of 18.03% compared to Martin Marietta Materials's net margin of -12.85%. Martin Marietta Materials's return on equity of 22.49% beat United States Antimony's return on equity of -6.64%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $606.78, signalling upside risk potential of 27.2%. On the other hand United States Antimony has an analysts' consensus of $2.78 which suggests that it could grow by 31.91%. Given that United States Antimony has higher upside potential than Martin Marietta Materials, analysts believe United States Antimony is more attractive than Martin Marietta Materials.

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.888, which suggesting that the stock is 11.24% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Antimony has a beta of 0.667, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.303%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. United States Antimony offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Martin Marietta Materials pays 9.47% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Antimony pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Martin Marietta Materials's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Martin Marietta Materials quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than United States Antimony quarterly revenues of $6.9M. Martin Marietta Materials's net income of $294M is higher than United States Antimony's net income of -$882.9K. Notably, Martin Marietta Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.76x while United States Antimony's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Martin Marietta Materials is 4.50x versus 15.36x for United States Antimony. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Lime & Minerals has a net margin of 18.03% compared to Martin Marietta Materials's net margin of 33.71%. Martin Marietta Materials's return on equity of 22.49% beat United States Lime & Minerals's return on equity of 24.5%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $606.78, signalling upside risk potential of 27.2%. On the other hand United States Lime & Minerals has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Martin Marietta Materials has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, analysts believe Martin Marietta Materials is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals.

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.888, which suggesting that the stock is 11.24% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.905, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.478%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. United States Lime & Minerals offers a yield of 0.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Martin Marietta Materials pays 9.47% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals pays out 5.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Martin Marietta Materials quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are larger than United States Lime & Minerals quarterly revenues of $80.1M. Martin Marietta Materials's net income of $294M is higher than United States Lime & Minerals's net income of $27M. Notably, Martin Marietta Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.76x while United States Lime & Minerals's PE ratio is 24.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Martin Marietta Materials is 4.50x versus 8.40x for United States Lime & Minerals. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vulcan Materials has a net margin of 18.03% compared to Martin Marietta Materials's net margin of 15.84%. Martin Marietta Materials's return on equity of 22.49% beat Vulcan Materials's return on equity of 11.76%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a consensus price target of $606.78, signalling upside risk potential of 27.2%. On the other hand Vulcan Materials has an analysts' consensus of $298.35 which suggests that it could grow by 27.46%. Given that Vulcan Materials has higher upside potential than Martin Marietta Materials, analysts believe Vulcan Materials is more attractive than Martin Marietta Materials.

Martin Marietta Materials has a beta of 0.888, which suggesting that the stock is 11.24% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.800, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.027%.

Martin Marietta Materials has a quarterly dividend of $0.79 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. Vulcan Materials offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. Martin Marietta Materials pays 9.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Vulcan Materials pays out 26.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Martin Marietta Materials quarterly revenues are $1.6B, which are smaller than Vulcan Materials quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Martin Marietta Materials's net income of $294M is higher than Vulcan Materials's net income of $293.7M. Notably, Martin Marietta Materials's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.76x while Vulcan Materials's PE ratio is 34.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Martin Marietta Materials is 4.50x versus 4.20x for Vulcan Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.