USLM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MP Materials has a net margin of 33.71% compared to United States Lime & Minerals's net margin of -36.64%. United States Lime & Minerals's return on equity of 24.5% beat MP Materials's return on equity of -5.71%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MP Materials has an analysts' consensus of $26.38 which suggests that it could grow by 1.87%. Given that MP Materials has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, analysts believe MP Materials is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals.

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.478% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MP Materials has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. MP Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Lime & Minerals pays 5.25% of its earnings as a dividend. MP Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United States Lime & Minerals quarterly revenues are $80.1M, which are larger than MP Materials quarterly revenues of $61M. United States Lime & Minerals's net income of $27M is higher than MP Materials's net income of -$22.3M. Notably, United States Lime & Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.52x while MP Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Lime & Minerals is 8.40x versus 21.59x for MP Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NioCorp Developments has a net margin of 33.71% compared to United States Lime & Minerals's net margin of --. United States Lime & Minerals's return on equity of 24.5% beat NioCorp Developments's return on equity of --.

United States Lime & Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NioCorp Developments has an analysts' consensus of $3.63 which suggests that it could grow by 86.94%. Given that NioCorp Developments has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, analysts believe NioCorp Developments is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals.

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.478% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NioCorp Developments has a beta of 0.025, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 97.488%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. NioCorp Developments offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Lime & Minerals pays 5.25% of its earnings as a dividend. NioCorp Developments pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United States Lime & Minerals quarterly revenues are $80.1M, which are larger than NioCorp Developments quarterly revenues of --. United States Lime & Minerals's net income of $27M is higher than NioCorp Developments's net income of -$450K. Notably, United States Lime & Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.52x while NioCorp Developments's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Lime & Minerals is 8.40x versus 3,671.04x for NioCorp Developments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Antimony has a net margin of 33.71% compared to United States Lime & Minerals's net margin of -12.85%. United States Lime & Minerals's return on equity of 24.5% beat United States Antimony's return on equity of -6.64%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand United States Antimony has an analysts' consensus of $2.78 which suggests that it could grow by 31.91%. Given that United States Antimony has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, analysts believe United States Antimony is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals.

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.478% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Antimony has a beta of 0.667, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.303%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. United States Antimony offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. United States Lime & Minerals pays 5.25% of its earnings as a dividend. United States Antimony pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Lime & Minerals's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United States Lime & Minerals quarterly revenues are $80.1M, which are larger than United States Antimony quarterly revenues of $6.9M. United States Lime & Minerals's net income of $27M is higher than United States Antimony's net income of -$882.9K. Notably, United States Lime & Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.52x while United States Antimony's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Lime & Minerals is 8.40x versus 15.36x for United States Antimony. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vulcan Materials has a net margin of 33.71% compared to United States Lime & Minerals's net margin of 15.84%. United States Lime & Minerals's return on equity of 24.5% beat Vulcan Materials's return on equity of 11.76%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Vulcan Materials has an analysts' consensus of $298.35 which suggests that it could grow by 27.46%. Given that Vulcan Materials has higher upside potential than United States Lime & Minerals, analysts believe Vulcan Materials is more attractive than United States Lime & Minerals.

United States Lime & Minerals has a beta of 0.905, which suggesting that the stock is 9.478% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vulcan Materials has a beta of 0.800, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 20.027%.

United States Lime & Minerals has a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.23%. Vulcan Materials offers a yield of 0.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.49 per share. United States Lime & Minerals pays 5.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Vulcan Materials pays out 26.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United States Lime & Minerals quarterly revenues are $80.1M, which are smaller than Vulcan Materials quarterly revenues of $1.9B. United States Lime & Minerals's net income of $27M is lower than Vulcan Materials's net income of $293.7M. Notably, United States Lime & Minerals's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.52x while Vulcan Materials's PE ratio is 34.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United States Lime & Minerals is 8.40x versus 4.20x for Vulcan Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.