TXT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

General Dynamics has a net margin of 3.9% compared to Textron's net margin of 8.61%. Textron's return on equity of 11.8% beat General Dynamics's return on equity of 17.23%.

Textron has a consensus price target of $85.64, signalling upside risk potential of 31.79%. On the other hand General Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $287.67 which suggests that it could grow by 3.99%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than General Dynamics, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than General Dynamics.

Textron has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.278% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison General Dynamics has a beta of 0.429, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.074%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. General Dynamics offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. Textron pays 1.46% of its earnings as a dividend. General Dynamics pays out 40.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than General Dynamics quarterly revenues of $13.3B. Textron's net income of $141M is lower than General Dynamics's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.04x while General Dynamics's PE ratio is 20.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 0.90x versus 1.62x for General Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

GE Aerospace has a net margin of 3.9% compared to Textron's net margin of 17.57%. Textron's return on equity of 11.8% beat GE Aerospace's return on equity of 27.96%.

Textron has a consensus price target of $85.64, signalling upside risk potential of 31.79%. On the other hand GE Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of $219.02 which suggests that it could grow by 20.04%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than GE Aerospace, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than GE Aerospace.

Textron has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.278% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Aerospace has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.7%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. GE Aerospace offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share. Textron pays 1.46% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Aerospace pays out 15.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than GE Aerospace quarterly revenues of $10.8B. Textron's net income of $141M is lower than GE Aerospace's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.04x while GE Aerospace's PE ratio is 30.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 0.90x versus 4.36x for GE Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lockheed Martin has a net margin of 3.9% compared to Textron's net margin of 2.83%. Textron's return on equity of 11.8% beat Lockheed Martin's return on equity of 80.38%.

Textron has a consensus price target of $85.64, signalling upside risk potential of 31.79%. On the other hand Lockheed Martin has an analysts' consensus of $523.08 which suggests that it could grow by 9.64%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than Lockheed Martin, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than Lockheed Martin.

Textron has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.278% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lockheed Martin has a beta of 0.389, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.059%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. Lockheed Martin offers a yield of 2.7% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.30 per share. Textron pays 1.46% of its earnings as a dividend. Lockheed Martin pays out 57.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are smaller than Lockheed Martin quarterly revenues of $18.6B. Textron's net income of $141M is lower than Lockheed Martin's net income of $527M. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.04x while Lockheed Martin's PE ratio is 21.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 0.90x versus 1.61x for Lockheed Martin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TransDigm Group has a net margin of 3.9% compared to Textron's net margin of 24.58%. Textron's return on equity of 11.8% beat TransDigm Group's return on equity of --.

Textron has a consensus price target of $85.64, signalling upside risk potential of 31.79%. On the other hand TransDigm Group has an analysts' consensus of $1,484.82 which suggests that it could grow by 11.12%. Given that Textron has higher upside potential than TransDigm Group, analysts believe Textron is more attractive than TransDigm Group.

Textron has a beta of 1.063, which suggesting that the stock is 6.278% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TransDigm Group has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.271%.

Textron has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.12%. TransDigm Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $75.00 per share. Textron pays 1.46% of its earnings as a dividend. TransDigm Group pays out 118.9% of its earnings as a dividend. Textron's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but TransDigm Group's is not.

Textron quarterly revenues are $3.6B, which are larger than TransDigm Group quarterly revenues of $2B. Textron's net income of $141M is lower than TransDigm Group's net income of $493M. Notably, Textron's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.04x while TransDigm Group's PE ratio is 47.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Textron is 0.90x versus 9.49x for TransDigm Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.