SLB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Halliburton has a net margin of 11.8% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 10.96%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.16% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $50.54, signalling upside risk potential of 48.01%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $32.01 which suggests that it could grow by 49.36%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Schlumberger, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Schlumberger.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.108, which suggesting that the stock is 10.846% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.453, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.349%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Halliburton offers a yield of 3.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Schlumberger pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.3B, which are larger than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.6B. Schlumberger's net income of $1.1B is higher than Halliburton's net income of $615M. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.98x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 7.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.35x versus 0.82x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 11.8% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 16.73%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.16% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.23%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $50.54, signalling upside risk potential of 48.01%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $30.30 which suggests that it could grow by 12.42%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.108, which suggesting that the stock is 10.846% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.725, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.499%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Schlumberger pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.3B, which are larger than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4B. Schlumberger's net income of $1.1B is higher than Kinder Morgan's net income of $667M. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.98x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 23.03x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.35x versus 3.96x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Targa Resources has a net margin of 11.8% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 7.97%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.16% beat Targa Resources's return on equity of 29.27%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $50.54, signalling upside risk potential of 48.01%. On the other hand Targa Resources has an analysts' consensus of $215.03 which suggests that it could grow by 24.53%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Targa Resources, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Targa Resources.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.108, which suggesting that the stock is 10.846% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Targa Resources has a beta of 1.751, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.072%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Targa Resources offers a yield of 1.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Schlumberger pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Targa Resources pays out 46.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.3B, which are larger than Targa Resources quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Schlumberger's net income of $1.1B is higher than Targa Resources's net income of $351M. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.98x while Targa Resources's PE ratio is 29.98x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.35x versus 2.33x for Targa Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Exxon Mobil has a net margin of 11.8% compared to Schlumberger's net margin of 9.39%. Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.16% beat Exxon Mobil's return on equity of 13.48%.

Schlumberger has a consensus price target of $50.54, signalling upside risk potential of 48.01%. On the other hand Exxon Mobil has an analysts' consensus of $124.83 which suggests that it could grow by 19.92%. Given that Schlumberger has higher upside potential than Exxon Mobil, analysts believe Schlumberger is more attractive than Exxon Mobil.

Schlumberger has a beta of 1.108, which suggesting that the stock is 10.846% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Exxon Mobil has a beta of 0.605, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.482%.

Schlumberger has a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.25%. Exxon Mobil offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.99 per share. Schlumberger pays 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Exxon Mobil pays out 49.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Schlumberger quarterly revenues are $9.3B, which are smaller than Exxon Mobil quarterly revenues of $81.1B. Schlumberger's net income of $1.1B is lower than Exxon Mobil's net income of $7.6B. Notably, Schlumberger's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.98x while Exxon Mobil's PE ratio is 13.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Schlumberger is 1.35x versus 1.32x for Exxon Mobil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.