HAL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

TechnipFMC PLC has a net margin of 10.96% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 9.49%. Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98% beat TechnipFMC PLC's return on equity of 26.91%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $34.19, signalling upside risk potential of 35.55%. On the other hand TechnipFMC PLC has an analysts' consensus of $34.26 which suggests that it could grow by 21.19%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than TechnipFMC PLC, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than TechnipFMC PLC.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.849, which suggesting that the stock is 84.903% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TechnipFMC PLC has a beta of 1.563, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 56.274%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. TechnipFMC PLC offers a yield of 0.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. TechnipFMC PLC pays out 10.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than TechnipFMC PLC quarterly revenues of $2.4B. Halliburton's net income of $615M is higher than TechnipFMC PLC's net income of $224.7M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.91x while TechnipFMC PLC's PE ratio is 14.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.97x versus 1.37x for TechnipFMC PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of 10.96% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 16.73%. Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.23%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $34.19, signalling upside risk potential of 35.55%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $29.90 which suggests that it could grow by 7.6%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.849, which suggesting that the stock is 84.903% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.936, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.412%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4B. Halliburton's net income of $615M is lower than Kinder Morgan's net income of $667M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.91x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 23.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.97x versus 4.09x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Schlumberger has a net margin of 10.96% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 11.8%. Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98% beat Schlumberger's return on equity of 20.16%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $34.19, signalling upside risk potential of 35.55%. On the other hand Schlumberger has an analysts' consensus of $53.04 which suggests that it could grow by 28.03%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Schlumberger, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Schlumberger.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.849, which suggesting that the stock is 84.903% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Schlumberger has a beta of 1.469, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.886%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Schlumberger offers a yield of 2.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Schlumberger pays out 34.37% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are smaller than Schlumberger quarterly revenues of $9.3B. Halliburton's net income of $615M is lower than Schlumberger's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.91x while Schlumberger's PE ratio is 13.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.97x versus 1.64x for Schlumberger. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Targa Resources has a net margin of 10.96% compared to Halliburton's net margin of 7.97%. Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98% beat Targa Resources's return on equity of 29.27%.

Halliburton has a consensus price target of $34.19, signalling upside risk potential of 35.55%. On the other hand Targa Resources has an analysts' consensus of $216.75 which suggests that it could grow by 9.9%. Given that Halliburton has higher upside potential than Targa Resources, analysts believe Halliburton is more attractive than Targa Resources.

Halliburton has a beta of 1.849, which suggesting that the stock is 84.903% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Targa Resources has a beta of 2.320, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 132.004%.

Halliburton has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.7%. Targa Resources offers a yield of 1.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.75 per share. Halliburton pays 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Targa Resources pays out 46.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Halliburton quarterly revenues are $5.6B, which are larger than Targa Resources quarterly revenues of $4.4B. Halliburton's net income of $615M is higher than Targa Resources's net income of $351M. Notably, Halliburton's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.91x while Targa Resources's PE ratio is 34.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Halliburton is 0.97x versus 2.65x for Targa Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.