LRCX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Advanced Micro Devices has a net margin of 27.22% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 6.29%. Lam Research's return on equity of 51.04% beat Advanced Micro Devices's return on equity of 2.9%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $95.42, signalling upside risk potential of 24.59%. On the other hand Advanced Micro Devices has an analysts' consensus of $148.34 which suggests that it could grow by 47.17%. Given that Advanced Micro Devices has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe Advanced Micro Devices is more attractive than Lam Research.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.532, which suggesting that the stock is 53.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Advanced Micro Devices has a beta of 1.739, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.869%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Advanced Micro Devices offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Advanced Micro Devices pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than Advanced Micro Devices quarterly revenues of $7.7B. Lam Research's net income of $1.2B is higher than Advanced Micro Devices's net income of $482M. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.27x while Advanced Micro Devices's PE ratio is 101.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 6.17x versus 6.40x for Advanced Micro Devices. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 27.22% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 26.8%. Lam Research's return on equity of 51.04% beat KLA's return on equity of 96.34%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $95.42, signalling upside risk potential of 24.59%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $819.68 which suggests that it could grow by 20.47%. Given that Lam Research has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe Lam Research is more attractive than KLA.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.532, which suggesting that the stock is 53.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.786%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. KLA offers a yield of 0.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. Lam Research's net income of $1.2B is higher than KLA's net income of $824.5M. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.27x while KLA's PE ratio is 28.61x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 6.17x versus 8.47x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 27.22% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 11.02%. Lam Research's return on equity of 51.04% beat Marvell Technology's return on equity of -6.29%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $95.42, signalling upside risk potential of 24.59%. On the other hand Marvell Technology has an analysts' consensus of $113.96 which suggests that it could grow by 63.14%. Given that Marvell Technology has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe Marvell Technology is more attractive than Lam Research.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.532, which suggesting that the stock is 53.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marvell Technology has a beta of 1.424, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.435%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Marvell Technology offers a yield of 0.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Marvell Technology pays out -23.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Lam Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are larger than Marvell Technology quarterly revenues of $1.8B. Lam Research's net income of $1.2B is higher than Marvell Technology's net income of $200.2M. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.27x while Marvell Technology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 6.17x versus 10.48x for Marvell Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Microsoft has a net margin of 27.22% compared to Lam Research's net margin of 34.62%. Lam Research's return on equity of 51.04% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

Lam Research has a consensus price target of $95.42, signalling upside risk potential of 24.59%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $506.25 which suggests that it could grow by 32.09%. Given that Microsoft has higher upside potential than Lam Research, analysts believe Microsoft is more attractive than Lam Research.

Lam Research has a beta of 1.532, which suggesting that the stock is 53.235% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.215%.

Lam Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.16%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Lam Research pays 26.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Lam Research quarterly revenues are $4.4B, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. Lam Research's net income of $1.2B is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, Lam Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.27x while Microsoft's PE ratio is 30.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Lam Research is 6.17x versus 10.94x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.