CF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Ingevity has a net margin of 20.15% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of -28.44%. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 14.37% beat Ingevity's return on equity of -116.58%.

CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $90.28, signalling downside risk potential of -4.96%. On the other hand Ingevity has an analysts' consensus of $54.25 which suggests that it could grow by 35.35%. Given that Ingevity has higher upside potential than CF Industries Holdings, analysts believe Ingevity is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings.

CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.388% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ingevity has a beta of 1.650, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.024%.

CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Ingevity offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 20.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Ingevity pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Ingevity quarterly revenues of $376.9M. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $276M is higher than Ingevity's net income of -$107.2M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while Ingevity's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.94x versus 0.98x for Ingevity. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 20.15% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of --. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 14.37% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $90.28, signalling downside risk potential of -4.96%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 227.87%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than CF Industries Holdings, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings.

CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.388% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.881, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.144%.

CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 20.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $276M is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.94x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Scotts Miracle Gro has a net margin of 20.15% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of -58.84%. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 14.37% beat The Scotts Miracle Gro's return on equity of --.

CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $90.28, signalling downside risk potential of -4.96%. On the other hand The Scotts Miracle Gro has an analysts' consensus of $79.88 which suggests that it could grow by 16.9%. Given that The Scotts Miracle Gro has higher upside potential than CF Industries Holdings, analysts believe The Scotts Miracle Gro is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings.

CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.388% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Scotts Miracle Gro has a beta of 1.728, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.836%.

CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. The Scotts Miracle Gro offers a yield of 3.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 20.39% of its earnings as a dividend. The Scotts Miracle Gro pays out -433.52% of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than The Scotts Miracle Gro quarterly revenues of $414.7M. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $276M is higher than The Scotts Miracle Gro's net income of -$244M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while The Scotts Miracle Gro's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.94x versus 1.10x for The Scotts Miracle Gro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Solitario Resources has a net margin of 20.15% compared to CF Industries Holdings's net margin of --. CF Industries Holdings's return on equity of 14.37% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

CF Industries Holdings has a consensus price target of $90.28, signalling downside risk potential of -4.96%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 135.48%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than CF Industries Holdings, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than CF Industries Holdings.

CF Industries Holdings has a beta of 0.986, which suggesting that the stock is 1.388% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.890, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.984%.

CF Industries Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.11%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. CF Industries Holdings pays 20.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. CF Industries Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

CF Industries Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.4B, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. CF Industries Holdings's net income of $276M is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, CF Industries Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 15.03x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for CF Industries Holdings is 2.94x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.