CB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Allstate has a net margin of 18.04% compared to Chubb's net margin of 11.68%. Chubb's return on equity of 14% beat Allstate's return on equity of 24.09%.

Chubb has a consensus price target of $300.92, signalling upside risk potential of 0.86%. On the other hand Allstate has an analysts' consensus of $225.00 which suggests that it could grow by 7.51%. Given that Allstate has higher upside potential than Chubb, analysts believe Allstate is more attractive than Chubb.

Chubb has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.888% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Allstate has a beta of 0.472, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.839%.

Chubb has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Allstate offers a yield of 1.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. Chubb pays 15.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Allstate pays out 23.12% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chubb quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are smaller than Allstate quarterly revenues of $16.5B. Chubb's net income of $2.6B is higher than Allstate's net income of $1.9B. Notably, Chubb's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.31x while Allstate's PE ratio is 12.32x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chubb is 2.18x versus 0.87x for Allstate. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mastercard has a net margin of 18.04% compared to Chubb's net margin of 44.63%. Chubb's return on equity of 14% beat Mastercard's return on equity of 179.81%.

Chubb has a consensus price target of $300.92, signalling upside risk potential of 0.86%. On the other hand Mastercard has an analysts' consensus of $618.26 which suggests that it could grow by 10.89%. Given that Mastercard has higher upside potential than Chubb, analysts believe Mastercard is more attractive than Chubb.

Chubb has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.888% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mastercard has a beta of 1.101, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.122%.

Chubb has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Mastercard offers a yield of 0.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share. Chubb pays 15.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chubb quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are larger than Mastercard quarterly revenues of $7.5B. Chubb's net income of $2.6B is lower than Mastercard's net income of $3.3B. Notably, Chubb's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.31x while Mastercard's PE ratio is 40.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chubb is 2.18x versus 18.35x for Mastercard. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Progressive has a net margin of 18.04% compared to Chubb's net margin of 11.63%. Chubb's return on equity of 14% beat Progressive's return on equity of 35.88%.

Chubb has a consensus price target of $300.92, signalling upside risk potential of 0.86%. On the other hand Progressive has an analysts' consensus of $290.3529 which suggests that it could grow by 5.71%. Given that Progressive has higher upside potential than Chubb, analysts believe Progressive is more attractive than Chubb.

Chubb has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.888% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Progressive has a beta of 0.350, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.961%.

Chubb has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Progressive offers a yield of 1.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $4.60 per share. Chubb pays 15.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Progressive pays out 8.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chubb quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are smaller than Progressive quarterly revenues of $20.3B. Chubb's net income of $2.6B is higher than Progressive's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Chubb's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.31x while Progressive's PE ratio is 19.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chubb is 2.18x versus 2.14x for Progressive. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Travelers Companies has a net margin of 18.04% compared to Chubb's net margin of 17.33%. Chubb's return on equity of 14% beat The Travelers Companies's return on equity of 19.17%.

Chubb has a consensus price target of $300.92, signalling upside risk potential of 0.86%. On the other hand The Travelers Companies has an analysts' consensus of $269.30 which suggests that it could grow by 2.52%. Given that The Travelers Companies has higher upside potential than Chubb, analysts believe The Travelers Companies is more attractive than Chubb.

Chubb has a beta of 0.661, which suggesting that the stock is 33.888% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Travelers Companies has a beta of 0.606, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.388%.

Chubb has a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. The Travelers Companies offers a yield of 1.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.05 per share. Chubb pays 15.49% of its earnings as a dividend. The Travelers Companies pays out 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Chubb quarterly revenues are $14.3B, which are larger than The Travelers Companies quarterly revenues of $12B. Chubb's net income of $2.6B is higher than The Travelers Companies's net income of $2.1B. Notably, Chubb's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.31x while The Travelers Companies's PE ratio is 12.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Chubb is 2.18x versus 1.31x for The Travelers Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.