MA Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blackstone has a net margin of 44.63% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 26.04%. Mastercard's return on equity of 179.81% beat Blackstone's return on equity of 14.74%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $618.26, signalling upside risk potential of 14.36%. On the other hand Blackstone has an analysts' consensus of $182.35 which suggests that it could grow by 32.03%. Given that Blackstone has higher upside potential than Mastercard, analysts believe Blackstone is more attractive than Mastercard.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.122% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackstone has a beta of 1.552, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.211%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. Blackstone offers a yield of 2.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.44 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Blackstone pays out 159.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Blackstone's is not.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.5B, which are larger than Blackstone quarterly revenues of $2.7B. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is higher than Blackstone's net income of $703.9M. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.92x while Blackstone's PE ratio is 38.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 17.79x versus 9.69x for Blackstone. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PayPal Holdings has a net margin of 44.63% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 13.4%. Mastercard's return on equity of 179.81% beat PayPal Holdings's return on equity of 20.14%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $618.26, signalling upside risk potential of 14.36%. On the other hand PayPal Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $94.15 which suggests that it could grow by 44.73%. Given that PayPal Holdings has higher upside potential than Mastercard, analysts believe PayPal Holdings is more attractive than Mastercard.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.122% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PayPal Holdings has a beta of 1.523, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.289%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. PayPal Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. PayPal Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mastercard's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.5B, which are smaller than PayPal Holdings quarterly revenues of $8.4B. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is higher than PayPal Holdings's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.92x while PayPal Holdings's PE ratio is 16.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 17.79x versus 2.13x for PayPal Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Visa has a net margin of 44.63% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 53.83%. Mastercard's return on equity of 179.81% beat Visa's return on equity of 50.59%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $618.26, signalling upside risk potential of 14.36%. On the other hand Visa has an analysts' consensus of $373.81 which suggests that it could grow by 9.84%. Given that Mastercard has higher upside potential than Visa, analysts believe Mastercard is more attractive than Visa.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.122% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Visa has a beta of 0.950, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.971%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. Visa offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Visa pays out 21.36% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.5B, which are smaller than Visa quarterly revenues of $9.5B. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is lower than Visa's net income of $5.1B. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.92x while Visa's PE ratio is 34.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 17.79x versus 18.76x for Visa. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wells Fargo & has a net margin of 44.63% compared to Mastercard's net margin of 24.92%. Mastercard's return on equity of 179.81% beat Wells Fargo &'s return on equity of 10.79%.

Mastercard has a consensus price target of $618.26, signalling upside risk potential of 14.36%. On the other hand Wells Fargo & has an analysts' consensus of $83.10 which suggests that it could grow by 17.55%. Given that Wells Fargo & has higher upside potential than Mastercard, analysts believe Wells Fargo & is more attractive than Mastercard.

Mastercard has a beta of 1.101, which suggesting that the stock is 10.122% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wells Fargo & has a beta of 1.164, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.383%.

Mastercard has a quarterly dividend of $0.76 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.65%. Wells Fargo & offers a yield of 2.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Mastercard pays 19.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Wells Fargo & pays out 31.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mastercard quarterly revenues are $7.5B, which are smaller than Wells Fargo & quarterly revenues of $20.4B. Mastercard's net income of $3.3B is lower than Wells Fargo &'s net income of $5.1B. Notably, Mastercard's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.92x while Wells Fargo &'s PE ratio is 13.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mastercard is 17.79x versus 2.98x for Wells Fargo &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.