FRFHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Pineapple Financial has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Fairfax Financial Holdings's net margin of -11.04%. Fairfax Financial Holdings's return on equity of 14.74% beat Pineapple Financial's return on equity of -175.66%.

Fairfax Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.97%. On the other hand Pineapple Financial has an analysts' consensus of $5.00 which suggests that it could grow by 1082.03%. Given that Pineapple Financial has higher upside potential than Fairfax Financial Holdings, analysts believe Pineapple Financial is more attractive than Fairfax Financial Holdings.

Fairfax Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.811, which suggesting that the stock is 18.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pineapple Financial has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Fairfax Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $15.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Pineapple Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Fairfax Financial Holdings pays 6.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Pineapple Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fairfax Financial Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fairfax Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are larger than Pineapple Financial quarterly revenues of $15.6M. Fairfax Financial Holdings's net income of $1B is higher than Pineapple Financial's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Fairfax Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.44x while Pineapple Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fairfax Financial Holdings is 1.12x versus 0.14x for Pineapple Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Fairfax Financial Holdings's net margin of 8.89%. Fairfax Financial Holdings's return on equity of 14.74% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 9.26%.

Fairfax Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.97%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -11.73%. Given that Fairfax Financial Holdings has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe Fairfax Financial Holdings is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

Fairfax Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.811, which suggesting that the stock is 18.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.203, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 79.686%.

Fairfax Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $15.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. Fairfax Financial Holdings pays 6.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 282.34% of its earnings as a dividend. Fairfax Financial Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Safety Insurance Group's is not.

Fairfax Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $291.1M. Fairfax Financial Holdings's net income of $1B is higher than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $25.9M. Notably, Fairfax Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.44x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 15.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fairfax Financial Holdings is 1.12x versus 1.08x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Fairfax Financial Holdings's net margin of 7.42%. Fairfax Financial Holdings's return on equity of 14.74% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.04%.

Fairfax Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.97%. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $104.29 which suggests that it could grow by 12.27%. Given that Fairfax Financial Holdings has higher upside potential than Selective Insurance Group, analysts believe Fairfax Financial Holdings is more attractive than Selective Insurance Group.

Fairfax Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.811, which suggesting that the stock is 18.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.624, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.633%.

Fairfax Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $15.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. Selective Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.54% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. Fairfax Financial Holdings pays 6.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 22.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fairfax Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are larger than Selective Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Fairfax Financial Holdings's net income of $1B is higher than Selective Insurance Group's net income of $92.3M. Notably, Fairfax Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.44x while Selective Insurance Group's PE ratio is 25.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fairfax Financial Holdings is 1.12x versus 1.20x for Selective Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United Fire Group has a net margin of 12.8% compared to Fairfax Financial Holdings's net margin of 6.12%. Fairfax Financial Holdings's return on equity of 14.74% beat United Fire Group's return on equity of 6.91%.

Fairfax Financial Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 15.97%. On the other hand United Fire Group has an analysts' consensus of $26.00 which suggests that it could grow by 0.39%. Given that Fairfax Financial Holdings has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, analysts believe Fairfax Financial Holdings is more attractive than United Fire Group.

Fairfax Financial Holdings has a beta of 0.811, which suggesting that the stock is 18.887% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United Fire Group has a beta of 0.542, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.808%.

Fairfax Financial Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $15.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.09%. United Fire Group offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Fairfax Financial Holdings pays 6.73% of its earnings as a dividend. United Fire Group pays out -54.42% of its earnings as a dividend. Fairfax Financial Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Fairfax Financial Holdings quarterly revenues are $8.1B, which are larger than United Fire Group quarterly revenues of $323M. Fairfax Financial Holdings's net income of $1B is higher than United Fire Group's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Fairfax Financial Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.44x while United Fire Group's PE ratio is 13.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fairfax Financial Holdings is 1.12x versus 0.55x for United Fire Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.