UFCS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

HCI Group has a net margin of 9.48% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 1.6%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.23% beat HCI Group's return on equity of 24.85%.

United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.73%. On the other hand HCI Group has an analysts' consensus of $158.25 which suggests that it could grow by 6.39%. Given that United Fire Group has higher upside potential than HCI Group, analysts believe United Fire Group is more attractive than HCI Group.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.329, which suggesting that the stock is 67.136% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HCI Group has a beta of 1.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.999%.

United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. HCI Group offers a yield of 1.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. United Fire Group pays 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. HCI Group pays out 15.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $331.7M, which are larger than HCI Group quarterly revenues of $161.4M. United Fire Group's net income of $31.4M is higher than HCI Group's net income of $2.6M. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.28x while HCI Group's PE ratio is 16.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.55x versus 2.41x for HCI Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 9.48% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 2.86%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.23% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 8.62%.

United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.73%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -9.39%. Given that United Fire Group has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe United Fire Group is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.329, which suggesting that the stock is 67.136% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.188, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.241%.

United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. United Fire Group pays 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 75.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $331.7M, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $284.7M. United Fire Group's net income of $31.4M is higher than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $8.1M. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.28x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 16.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.55x versus 1.03x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Selective Insurance Group has a net margin of 9.48% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 7.6%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.23% beat Selective Insurance Group's return on equity of 6.82%.

United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.73%. On the other hand Selective Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $93.00 which suggests that it could grow by 5.75%. Given that United Fire Group has higher upside potential than Selective Insurance Group, analysts believe United Fire Group is more attractive than Selective Insurance Group.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.329, which suggesting that the stock is 67.136% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Selective Insurance Group has a beta of 0.451, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.87%.

United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Selective Insurance Group offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share. United Fire Group pays 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Selective Insurance Group pays out 45.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $331.7M, which are smaller than Selective Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $1.3B. United Fire Group's net income of $31.4M is lower than Selective Insurance Group's net income of $95.5M. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.28x while Selective Insurance Group's PE ratio is 27.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.55x versus 1.11x for Selective Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Universal Insurance Holdings has a net margin of 9.48% compared to United Fire Group's net margin of 1.56%. United Fire Group's return on equity of 8.23% beat Universal Insurance Holdings's return on equity of 15.73%.

United Fire Group has a consensus price target of $30.00, signalling upside risk potential of 11.73%. On the other hand Universal Insurance Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.21%. Given that Universal Insurance Holdings has higher upside potential than United Fire Group, analysts believe Universal Insurance Holdings is more attractive than United Fire Group.

United Fire Group has a beta of 0.329, which suggesting that the stock is 67.136% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Universal Insurance Holdings has a beta of 0.757, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.271%.

United Fire Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.38%. Universal Insurance Holdings offers a yield of 2.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. United Fire Group pays 26.17% of its earnings as a dividend. Universal Insurance Holdings pays out 37.89% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

United Fire Group quarterly revenues are $331.7M, which are smaller than Universal Insurance Holdings quarterly revenues of $384.8M. United Fire Group's net income of $31.4M is higher than Universal Insurance Holdings's net income of $6M. Notably, United Fire Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 11.28x while Universal Insurance Holdings's PE ratio is 11.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for United Fire Group is 0.55x versus 0.43x for Universal Insurance Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.