FIEB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of -- compared to First IC's net margin of 20.42%. First IC's return on equity of -- beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 6.65%.

First IC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $45.50 which suggests that it could grow by 30.34%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than First IC, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than First IC.

First IC has a beta of 0.114, which suggesting that the stock is 88.641% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.462%.

First IC has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.8%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. First IC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First IC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18.3M. First IC's net income of -- is lower than Evans Bancorp's net income of $3.7M. Notably, First IC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 16.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First IC is -- versus 2.79x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MetroCity Bankshares has a net margin of -- compared to First IC's net margin of 47.98%. First IC's return on equity of -- beat MetroCity Bankshares's return on equity of 16.02%.

First IC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MetroCity Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $36.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.43%. Given that MetroCity Bankshares has higher upside potential than First IC, analysts believe MetroCity Bankshares is more attractive than First IC.

First IC has a beta of 0.114, which suggesting that the stock is 88.641% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MetroCity Bankshares has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.269%.

First IC has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.8%. MetroCity Bankshares offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. First IC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MetroCity Bankshares pays out 32.64% of its earnings as a dividend. MetroCity Bankshares's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First IC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MetroCity Bankshares quarterly revenues of $33.8M. First IC's net income of -- is lower than MetroCity Bankshares's net income of $16.2M. Notably, First IC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MetroCity Bankshares's PE ratio is 10.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First IC is -- versus 4.73x for MetroCity Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of -- compared to First IC's net margin of 28.72%. First IC's return on equity of -- beat Park National's return on equity of 12.67%.

First IC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $170.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.41%. Given that Park National has higher upside potential than First IC, analysts believe Park National is more attractive than First IC.

First IC has a beta of 0.114, which suggesting that the stock is 88.641% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.722, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.76%.

First IC has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.8%. Park National offers a yield of 2.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. First IC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First IC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $134.5M. First IC's net income of -- is lower than Park National's net income of $38.6M. Notably, First IC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park National's PE ratio is 15.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First IC is -- versus 4.48x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of -- compared to First IC's net margin of 25.81%. First IC's return on equity of -- beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.27%.

First IC has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $76.50 which suggests that it could grow by 36.75%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than First IC, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than First IC.

First IC has a beta of 0.114, which suggesting that the stock is 88.641% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.748, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.208%.

First IC has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.8%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 4.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. First IC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

First IC quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $76.2M. First IC's net income of -- is lower than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, First IC's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 11.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for First IC is -- versus 2.70x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.