CMSQY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

IREN has a net margin of -- compared to Computershare's net margin of 16.06%. Computershare's return on equity of 26.84% beat IREN's return on equity of -5.61%.

Computershare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IREN has an analysts' consensus of $20.77 which suggests that it could grow by 249.71%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Computershare, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Computershare.

Computershare has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.395% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IREN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Computershare has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. IREN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Computershare pays 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. IREN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Computershare quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IREN quarterly revenues of $117.5M. Computershare's net income of -- is lower than IREN's net income of $18.9M. Notably, Computershare's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.56x while IREN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computershare is 4.19x versus 3.70x for IREN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Platinum Asset Management has a net margin of -- compared to Computershare's net margin of --. Computershare's return on equity of 26.84% beat Platinum Asset Management's return on equity of --.

Computershare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Platinum Asset Management has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Computershare has higher upside potential than Platinum Asset Management, analysts believe Computershare is more attractive than Platinum Asset Management.

Computershare has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.395% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Platinum Asset Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Computershare has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. Platinum Asset Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Computershare pays 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Platinum Asset Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Computershare quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Platinum Asset Management quarterly revenues of --. Computershare's net income of -- is lower than Platinum Asset Management's net income of --. Notably, Computershare's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.56x while Platinum Asset Management's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computershare is 4.19x versus -- for Platinum Asset Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strategic Elements has a net margin of -- compared to Computershare's net margin of --. Computershare's return on equity of 26.84% beat Strategic Elements's return on equity of -50.35%.

Computershare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Strategic Elements has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Computershare has higher upside potential than Strategic Elements, analysts believe Computershare is more attractive than Strategic Elements.

Computershare has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.395% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strategic Elements has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Computershare has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. Strategic Elements offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Computershare pays 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Strategic Elements pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Computershare quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Strategic Elements quarterly revenues of --. Computershare's net income of -- is lower than Strategic Elements's net income of --. Notably, Computershare's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.56x while Strategic Elements's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computershare is 4.19x versus 1,864.39x for Strategic Elements. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Pacific Current Group has a net margin of -- compared to Computershare's net margin of --. Computershare's return on equity of 26.84% beat Pacific Current Group's return on equity of 32.85%.

Computershare has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacific Current Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Computershare has higher upside potential than Pacific Current Group, analysts believe Computershare is more attractive than Pacific Current Group.

Computershare has a beta of 0.746, which suggesting that the stock is 25.395% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Current Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Computershare has a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.12%. Pacific Current Group offers a yield of 3.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. Computershare pays 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group pays out 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Computershare quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacific Current Group quarterly revenues of --. Computershare's net income of -- is lower than Pacific Current Group's net income of --. Notably, Computershare's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.56x while Pacific Current Group's PE ratio is 2.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Computershare is 4.19x versus 2.08x for Pacific Current Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.