What Do Tesla Delivery Numbers Mean for Tesla Stock?
Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) released Q1 delivery numbers, showing a substantial slowdown…
Sell
24
TSRUF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$7.39
Seasonality move
:
3.15%
Day range:
$7.39 - $7.39
52-week range:
$6.01 - $7.73
Dividend yield:
3.35%
P/E ratio:
2.94x
P/S ratio:
2.08x
P/B ratio:
0.50x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
8
1-year change:
13.44%
Market cap:
$222.7M
Revenue:
$130.2M
EPS (TTM):
$2.51
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CDBT
China Dasheng Biotechnology
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$160.2M | $0.13 | 207.79% | 92.73% | $20.30 |
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
$7.39 | -- | $222.7M | 2.94x | $0.09 | 3.35% | 2.08x |
|
CDBT
China Dasheng Biotechnology
|
$0.0589 | -- | $2.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare
|
$23.28 | -- | $13.6B | 25.81x | $0.45 | 1.93% | 4.59x |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$5.63 | $20.30 | $1.2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 3.51x |
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group
|
$112.60 | -- | $42.9B | 19.06x | $1.71 | 3.79% | 9.93x |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries
|
$0.0020 | -- | $984.8K | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
0.08% | 0.093 | 0.1% | 61.84x |
|
CDBT
China Dasheng Biotechnology
|
-- | 4.677 | -- | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare
|
45.73% | 0.495 | 13.16% | 1.44x |
|
IREN
IREN
|
19.83% | 7.469 | 15.18% | 0.86x |
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group
|
80.78% | 1.902 | 153.8% | 0.57x |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries
|
-- | -11.476 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
-- | -- | 31.65% | 32.85% | -- | -- |
|
CDBT
China Dasheng Biotechnology
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CMSQY
Computershare
|
-- | -- | 13.84% | 26.84% | -- | -- |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$110.6M | $16.3M | -5.24% | -5.61% | 23.93% | -- |
|
MQBKY
Macquarie Group
|
-- | -- | 2.02% | 11.18% | -- | -- |
|
SIPN
SIPP International Industries
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Pacific Current Group vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRUF or CDBT?
China Dasheng Biotechnology has a net margin of -- compared to Pacific Current Group's net margin of --. Pacific Current Group's return on equity of 32.85% beat China Dasheng Biotechnology's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRUFPacific Current Group-- -- $449.6M CDBTChina Dasheng Biotechnology-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TSRUF or CDBT?
Pacific Current Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Dasheng Biotechnology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacific Current Group has higher upside potential than China Dasheng Biotechnology, analysts believe Pacific Current Group is more attractive than China Dasheng Biotechnology.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRUFPacific Current Group0 0 0 CDBTChina Dasheng Biotechnology0 0 0 -
Is TSRUF or CDBT More Risky?
Pacific Current Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Dasheng Biotechnology has a beta of 1.338, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.797%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRUF or CDBT?
Pacific Current Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.35%. China Dasheng Biotechnology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pacific Current Group pays 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. China Dasheng Biotechnology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRUF or CDBT?
Pacific Current Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than China Dasheng Biotechnology quarterly revenues of --. Pacific Current Group's net income of -- is lower than China Dasheng Biotechnology's net income of --. Notably, Pacific Current Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.94x while China Dasheng Biotechnology's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Current Group is 2.08x versus -- for China Dasheng Biotechnology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRUFPacific Current Group2.08x 2.94x -- -- CDBTChina Dasheng Biotechnology-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRUF or CMSQY?
Computershare has a net margin of -- compared to Pacific Current Group's net margin of --. Pacific Current Group's return on equity of 32.85% beat Computershare's return on equity of 26.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRUFPacific Current Group-- -- $449.6M CMSQYComputershare-- -- $3.5B -
What do Analysts Say About TSRUF or CMSQY?
Pacific Current Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Computershare has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacific Current Group has higher upside potential than Computershare, analysts believe Pacific Current Group is more attractive than Computershare.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRUFPacific Current Group0 0 0 CMSQYComputershare0 0 0 -
Is TSRUF or CMSQY More Risky?
Pacific Current Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Computershare has a beta of 0.746, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.395%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRUF or CMSQY?
Pacific Current Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.35%. Computershare offers a yield of 1.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Pacific Current Group pays 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Computershare pays out 77.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRUF or CMSQY?
Pacific Current Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Computershare quarterly revenues of --. Pacific Current Group's net income of -- is lower than Computershare's net income of --. Notably, Pacific Current Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.94x while Computershare's PE ratio is 25.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Current Group is 2.08x versus 4.59x for Computershare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRUFPacific Current Group2.08x 2.94x -- -- CMSQYComputershare4.59x 25.81x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRUF or IREN?
IREN has a net margin of -- compared to Pacific Current Group's net margin of 16.06%. Pacific Current Group's return on equity of 32.85% beat IREN's return on equity of -5.61%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRUFPacific Current Group-- -- $449.6M IRENIREN94.06% $0.09 $1.6B -
What do Analysts Say About TSRUF or IREN?
Pacific Current Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IREN has an analysts' consensus of $20.30 which suggests that it could grow by 260.49%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Pacific Current Group, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Pacific Current Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRUFPacific Current Group0 0 0 IRENIREN8 1 0 -
Is TSRUF or IREN More Risky?
Pacific Current Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IREN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRUF or IREN?
Pacific Current Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.35%. IREN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pacific Current Group pays 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. IREN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRUF or IREN?
Pacific Current Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IREN quarterly revenues of $117.5M. Pacific Current Group's net income of -- is lower than IREN's net income of $18.9M. Notably, Pacific Current Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.94x while IREN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Current Group is 2.08x versus 3.51x for IREN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRUFPacific Current Group2.08x 2.94x -- -- IRENIREN3.51x -- $117.5M $18.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRUF or MQBKY?
Macquarie Group has a net margin of -- compared to Pacific Current Group's net margin of --. Pacific Current Group's return on equity of 32.85% beat Macquarie Group's return on equity of 11.18%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRUFPacific Current Group-- -- $449.6M MQBKYMacquarie Group-- -- $116.6B -
What do Analysts Say About TSRUF or MQBKY?
Pacific Current Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Macquarie Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacific Current Group has higher upside potential than Macquarie Group, analysts believe Pacific Current Group is more attractive than Macquarie Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRUFPacific Current Group0 0 0 MQBKYMacquarie Group0 0 0 -
Is TSRUF or MQBKY More Risky?
Pacific Current Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Macquarie Group has a beta of 1.484, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.368%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRUF or MQBKY?
Pacific Current Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.35%. Macquarie Group offers a yield of 3.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.71 per share. Pacific Current Group pays 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Macquarie Group pays out 75.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRUF or MQBKY?
Pacific Current Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Macquarie Group quarterly revenues of --. Pacific Current Group's net income of -- is lower than Macquarie Group's net income of --. Notably, Pacific Current Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.94x while Macquarie Group's PE ratio is 19.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Current Group is 2.08x versus 9.93x for Macquarie Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRUFPacific Current Group2.08x 2.94x -- -- MQBKYMacquarie Group9.93x 19.06x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns TSRUF or SIPN?
SIPP International Industries has a net margin of -- compared to Pacific Current Group's net margin of --. Pacific Current Group's return on equity of 32.85% beat SIPP International Industries's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital TSRUFPacific Current Group-- -- $449.6M SIPNSIPP International Industries-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About TSRUF or SIPN?
Pacific Current Group has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SIPP International Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Pacific Current Group has higher upside potential than SIPP International Industries, analysts believe Pacific Current Group is more attractive than SIPP International Industries.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings TSRUFPacific Current Group0 0 0 SIPNSIPP International Industries0 0 0 -
Is TSRUF or SIPN More Risky?
Pacific Current Group has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIPP International Industries has a beta of 0.515, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.536%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock TSRUF or SIPN?
Pacific Current Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.35%. SIPP International Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pacific Current Group pays 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. SIPP International Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios TSRUF or SIPN?
Pacific Current Group quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SIPP International Industries quarterly revenues of --. Pacific Current Group's net income of -- is lower than SIPP International Industries's net income of --. Notably, Pacific Current Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 2.94x while SIPP International Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pacific Current Group is 2.08x versus -- for SIPP International Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income TSRUFPacific Current Group2.08x 2.94x -- -- SIPNSIPP International Industries-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Chewy a Growth Stock to Buy?
It might be a surprise to learn that during the…
Is Realty Income the Best Dividend Stock to Buy Long-Term?
Realty Income (NYSE:O) is a longstanding real estate investment trust…
Stock Ideas
Sell
45
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Sell
50
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 38x
Alerts
Buy
52
RGC alert for Apr 12
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 29.14% over the past day.
Buy
52
SLP alert for Apr 12
Simulations Plus [SLP] is up 26.73% over the past day.
Buy
89
GDXU alert for Apr 12
MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETN [GDXU] is up 15.9% over the past day.
