Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
40
SORHF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$0.26
Seasonality move
:
0%
Day range:
$0.26 - $0.26
52-week range:
$0.26 - $0.26
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
1,369.20x
P/B ratio:
33.89x
Volume:
--
Avg. volume:
--
1-year change:
--
Market cap:
$121.9M
Revenue:
$85.2K
EPS (TTM):
-$0.00
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$54.8M | -$0.07 | 190.35% | -6.46% | $20.45 |
|
MGLLF
Magellan Financial Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
$0.26 | -- | $121.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1,369.20x |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial
|
$1.30 | -- | $868.3M | -- | $0.06 | 9.3% | 0.71x |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$11.81 | $20.45 | $2.5B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 7.93x |
|
MGLLF
Magellan Financial Group
|
$6.42 | -- | $1.2B | 7.43x | $0.24 | 6.74% | 4.11x |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $0.00 | 0% | -- |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
$7.31 | -- | $381.3M | 5.23x | $0.15 | 3.45% | 2.97x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 11.94x |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial
|
27.58% | 0.238 | 59.97% | 1.31x |
|
IREN
IREN
|
-- | 8.875 | -- | 0.84x |
|
MGLLF
Magellan Financial Group
|
0.74% | 0.174 | 0.39% | 16.83x |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | -- |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
9.65% | -0.076 | 11.84% | 60.33x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SORHF
Strategic Elements
|
-- | -- | -38.32% | -38.32% | -- | -- |
|
IOOFF
Insignia Financial
|
-- | -- | -5.94% | -8.25% | -- | -- |
|
IREN
IREN
|
$46.7M | -$39.1M | -9.17% | -10.49% | -92.59% | -- |
|
MGLLF
Magellan Financial Group
|
-- | -- | 23.29% | 24% | -- | -- |
|
PTMGF
Platinum Asset Management
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
TSRUF
Pacific Current Group
|
-- | -- | 19.33% | 20.17% | -- | -- |
Strategic Elements vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SORHF or IOOFF?
Insignia Financial has a net margin of -- compared to Strategic Elements's net margin of --. Strategic Elements's return on equity of -38.32% beat Insignia Financial's return on equity of -8.25%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SORHFStrategic Elements-- -- $3.6M IOOFFInsignia Financial-- -- $1.9B -
What do Analysts Say About SORHF or IOOFF?
Strategic Elements has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Insignia Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Strategic Elements has higher upside potential than Insignia Financial, analysts believe Strategic Elements is more attractive than Insignia Financial.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SORHFStrategic Elements0 0 0 IOOFFInsignia Financial0 0 0 -
Is SORHF or IOOFF More Risky?
Strategic Elements has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Insignia Financial has a beta of 0.369, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.061%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SORHF or IOOFF?
Strategic Elements has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Insignia Financial offers a yield of 9.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Strategic Elements pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Insignia Financial pays out -55.91% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SORHF or IOOFF?
Strategic Elements quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Insignia Financial quarterly revenues of --. Strategic Elements's net income of -- is lower than Insignia Financial's net income of --. Notably, Strategic Elements's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Insignia Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Elements is 1,369.20x versus 0.71x for Insignia Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SORHFStrategic Elements1,369.20x -- -- -- IOOFFInsignia Financial0.71x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SORHF or IREN?
IREN has a net margin of -- compared to Strategic Elements's net margin of -95.07%. Strategic Elements's return on equity of -38.32% beat IREN's return on equity of -10.49%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SORHFStrategic Elements-- -- $3.6M IRENIREN85.8% -$0.27 $1.1B -
What do Analysts Say About SORHF or IREN?
Strategic Elements has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand IREN has an analysts' consensus of $20.45 which suggests that it could grow by 73.2%. Given that IREN has higher upside potential than Strategic Elements, analysts believe IREN is more attractive than Strategic Elements.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SORHFStrategic Elements0 0 0 IRENIREN8 2 0 -
Is SORHF or IREN More Risky?
Strategic Elements has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison IREN has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SORHF or IREN?
Strategic Elements has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. IREN offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategic Elements pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. IREN pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SORHF or IREN?
Strategic Elements quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than IREN quarterly revenues of $54.4M. Strategic Elements's net income of -- is lower than IREN's net income of -$51.7M. Notably, Strategic Elements's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while IREN's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Elements is 1,369.20x versus 7.93x for IREN. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SORHFStrategic Elements1,369.20x -- -- -- IRENIREN7.93x -- $54.4M -$51.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns SORHF or MGLLF?
Magellan Financial Group has a net margin of -- compared to Strategic Elements's net margin of --. Strategic Elements's return on equity of -38.32% beat Magellan Financial Group's return on equity of 24%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SORHFStrategic Elements-- -- $3.6M MGLLFMagellan Financial Group-- -- $686.5M -
What do Analysts Say About SORHF or MGLLF?
Strategic Elements has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Magellan Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Strategic Elements has higher upside potential than Magellan Financial Group, analysts believe Strategic Elements is more attractive than Magellan Financial Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SORHFStrategic Elements0 0 0 MGLLFMagellan Financial Group0 0 0 -
Is SORHF or MGLLF More Risky?
Strategic Elements has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Magellan Financial Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SORHF or MGLLF?
Strategic Elements has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Magellan Financial Group offers a yield of 6.74% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Strategic Elements pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Magellan Financial Group pays out 74.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Magellan Financial Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SORHF or MGLLF?
Strategic Elements quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Magellan Financial Group quarterly revenues of --. Strategic Elements's net income of -- is lower than Magellan Financial Group's net income of --. Notably, Strategic Elements's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Magellan Financial Group's PE ratio is 7.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Elements is 1,369.20x versus 4.11x for Magellan Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SORHFStrategic Elements1,369.20x -- -- -- MGLLFMagellan Financial Group4.11x 7.43x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SORHF or PTMGF?
Platinum Asset Management has a net margin of -- compared to Strategic Elements's net margin of --. Strategic Elements's return on equity of -38.32% beat Platinum Asset Management's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SORHFStrategic Elements-- -- $3.6M PTMGFPlatinum Asset Management-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About SORHF or PTMGF?
Strategic Elements has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Platinum Asset Management has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Strategic Elements has higher upside potential than Platinum Asset Management, analysts believe Strategic Elements is more attractive than Platinum Asset Management.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SORHFStrategic Elements0 0 0 PTMGFPlatinum Asset Management0 0 0 -
Is SORHF or PTMGF More Risky?
Strategic Elements has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Platinum Asset Management has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SORHF or PTMGF?
Strategic Elements has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Platinum Asset Management offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategic Elements pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Platinum Asset Management pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SORHF or PTMGF?
Strategic Elements quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Platinum Asset Management quarterly revenues of --. Strategic Elements's net income of -- is lower than Platinum Asset Management's net income of --. Notably, Strategic Elements's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Platinum Asset Management's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Elements is 1,369.20x versus -- for Platinum Asset Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SORHFStrategic Elements1,369.20x -- -- -- PTMGFPlatinum Asset Management-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns SORHF or TSRUF?
Pacific Current Group has a net margin of -- compared to Strategic Elements's net margin of --. Strategic Elements's return on equity of -38.32% beat Pacific Current Group's return on equity of 20.17%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SORHFStrategic Elements-- -- $3.6M TSRUFPacific Current Group-- -- $443.2M -
What do Analysts Say About SORHF or TSRUF?
Strategic Elements has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Pacific Current Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Strategic Elements has higher upside potential than Pacific Current Group, analysts believe Strategic Elements is more attractive than Pacific Current Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SORHFStrategic Elements0 0 0 TSRUFPacific Current Group0 0 0 -
Is SORHF or TSRUF More Risky?
Strategic Elements has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Pacific Current Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SORHF or TSRUF?
Strategic Elements has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Pacific Current Group offers a yield of 3.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Strategic Elements pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group pays out 17.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Pacific Current Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SORHF or TSRUF?
Strategic Elements quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Pacific Current Group quarterly revenues of --. Strategic Elements's net income of -- is lower than Pacific Current Group's net income of --. Notably, Strategic Elements's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Pacific Current Group's PE ratio is 5.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategic Elements is 1,369.20x versus 2.97x for Pacific Current Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SORHFStrategic Elements1,369.20x -- -- -- TSRUFPacific Current Group2.97x 5.23x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
