Why Did Buffett Sell the S&P 500?
Warren Buffett has always been an advocate of investing in…
Buy
63
KURE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$15.58
Seasonality move
:
3.45%
Day range:
$15.49 - $15.69
52-week range:
$12.91 - $20.51
Dividend yield:
1.18%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
38K
Avg. volume:
181.8K
1-year change:
7.09%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
$15.56 | -- | -- | -- | $0.18 | 1.18% | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
$28.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.19 | 0.66% | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$86.25 | -- | -- | -- | $1.50 | 2.47% | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
$22.76 | -- | -- | -- | $0.48 | 2.1% | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
$25.49 | -- | -- | -- | $0.33 | 1.31% | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
$29.75 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 4.38% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
-- | 1.231 | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | 0.555 | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 0.932 | -- | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
-- | 0.939 | -- | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | 1.038 | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | 1.336 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KURE
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHS
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KGRN
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KURE or ASHS?
Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- ASHSXtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KURE or ASHS?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF0 0 0 ASHSXtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF0 0 0 -
Is KURE or ASHS More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a beta of 0.681, which suggesting that the stock is 31.905% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF has a beta of 0.697, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.322%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KURE or ASHS?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KURE or ASHS?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- -- ASHSXtrackers Hvst CSI500 China A-Shs SC ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KURE or GXC?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KURE or GXC?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR S&P China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR S&P China ETF, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is more attractive than SPDR S&P China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF0 0 0 GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 -
Is KURE or GXC More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a beta of 0.681, which suggesting that the stock is 31.905% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.838, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.157%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KURE or GXC?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. SPDR S&P China ETF offers a yield of 2.47% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR S&P China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KURE or GXC?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR S&P China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR S&P China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- -- GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KURE or KALL?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KURE or KALL?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is more attractive than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF0 0 0 KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is KURE or KALL More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a beta of 0.681, which suggesting that the stock is 31.905% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a beta of 0.812, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.806%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KURE or KALL?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF offers a yield of 2.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KURE or KALL?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- -- KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KURE or KGRN?
KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KURE or KGRN?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is more attractive than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF0 0 0 KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is KURE or KGRN More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a beta of 0.681, which suggesting that the stock is 31.905% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF has a beta of 1.099, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.933%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KURE or KGRN?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF offers a yield of 1.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.33 per share. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KURE or KGRN?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- -- KGRNKraneShares MSCI China Clean Technology Index ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KURE or PGJ?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KURE or PGJ?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is more attractive than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF0 0 0 PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 -
Is KURE or PGJ More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a beta of 0.681, which suggesting that the stock is 31.905% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.457%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KURE or PGJ?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.18%. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KURE or PGJ?
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KUREKraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF-- -- -- -- PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will SoundHound AI Stock Recover?
SoundHound AI (NASDAQ:SOUN) is a leading maker of artificial intelligence…
What Stocks Did Warren Buffett Just Buy?
In Q4 of last year, Warren Buffett added to or…
Stock Ideas
Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Sell
46
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.8T
P/E Ratio: 32x
Sell
41
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.7T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
78
AJINY alert for Mar 29
Ajinomoto [AJINY] is up 99.61% over the past day.
Buy
69
AGX alert for Mar 29
Argan [AGX] is up 19.83% over the past day.
Sell
24
AIR alert for Mar 29
AAR [AIR] is down 16.36% over the past day.
