How High Will Airbnb Stock Go?
Airbnb, Inc. (NASDAQ:ABNB) share price has seen substantial turbulence over…
Sell
50
KALL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$20.99
Seasonality move
:
-1.27%
Day range:
$20.98 - $20.99
52-week range:
$16.33 - $28.00
Dividend yield:
2.28%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
1.2K
Avg. volume:
2.3K
1-year change:
18.43%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
$20.93 | -- | -- | -- | $0.48 | 2.28% | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
$16.99 | -- | -- | -- | $0.34 | 4.09% | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
$19.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.02 | 5.2% | -- |
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
$17.51 | -- | -- | -- | $0.43 | 4.42% | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
$31.09 | -- | -- | -- | $0.45 | 1.72% | -- |
|
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
|
$21.21 | -- | -- | -- | $0.82 | 3.85% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
-- | 0.988 | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | 1.298 | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | 0.857 | -- | -- |
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | 1.336 | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | 0.824 | -- | -- |
|
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
|
-- | 0.680 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
KALL
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
EWH
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLHK
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FXI
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
OBOR
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns KALL or EWH?
iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KALL or EWH?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF0 0 0 EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 -
Is KALL or EWH More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a beta of 0.781, which suggesting that the stock is 21.853% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.873, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.742%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KALL or EWH?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF offers a yield of 4.09% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KALL or EWH?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- -- EWHiShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KALL or FCA?
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KALL or FCA?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF is more attractive than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF0 0 0 FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund0 0 0 -
Is KALL or FCA More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a beta of 0.781, which suggesting that the stock is 21.853% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 0.838, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.162%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KALL or FCA?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 5.2% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KALL or FCA?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- -- FCAFirst Trust China AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KALL or FLHK?
Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KALL or FLHK?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF is more attractive than Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF0 0 0 FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF0 0 0 -
Is KALL or FLHK More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a beta of 0.781, which suggesting that the stock is 21.853% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF has a beta of 0.879, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.068%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KALL or FLHK?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF offers a yield of 4.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KALL or FLHK?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- -- FLHKFranklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KALL or FXI?
iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares China Large-Cap ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KALL or FXI?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares China Large-Cap ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares China Large-Cap ETF, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF is more attractive than iShares China Large-Cap ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF0 0 0 FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF0 0 0 -
Is KALL or FXI More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a beta of 0.781, which suggesting that the stock is 21.853% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares China Large-Cap ETF has a beta of 0.813, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.674%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KALL or FXI?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. iShares China Large-Cap ETF offers a yield of 1.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares China Large-Cap ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KALL or FXI?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares China Large-Cap ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares China Large-Cap ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares China Large-Cap ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares China Large-Cap ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- -- FXIiShares China Large-Cap ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns KALL or OBOR?
KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF has a net margin of -- compared to KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's net margin of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- OBORKraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About KALL or OBOR?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF, analysts believe KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF is more attractive than KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF0 0 0 OBORKraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF0 0 0 -
Is KALL or OBOR More Risky?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a beta of 0.781, which suggesting that the stock is 21.853% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF has a beta of 0.908, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.221%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock KALL or OBOR?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.28%. KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF offers a yield of 3.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.82 per share. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios KALL or OBOR?
KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF quarterly revenues of --. KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF's net income of --. Notably, KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for KraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income KALLKraneShares MSCI All China Index ETF-- -- -- -- OBORKraneShares MSCI One Belt One Road Index ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
57
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
64
ARQQ alert for Dec 27
Arqit Quantum [ARQQ] is up 49.85% over the past day.
Buy
64
QMCO alert for Dec 27
Quantum [QMCO] is up 49.62% over the past day.
Buy
65
ALGS alert for Dec 27
Aligos Therapeutics [ALGS] is up 10.88% over the past day.
