What Is Hindsight Bias In Investing?
You’ve probably heard the expression “hindsight is 20/20.” That saying…
Buy
64
GXC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$86.92
Seasonality move
:
3.78%
Day range:
$86.73 - $87.76
52-week range:
$64.28 - $97.17
Dividend yield:
2.45%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
83.5K
Avg. volume:
69.3K
1-year change:
32.51%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$86.82 | -- | -- | -- | $1.50 | 2.45% | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
$26.87 | -- | -- | -- | $0.30 | 1.11% | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
$34.06 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 1.5% | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
$23.80 | -- | -- | -- | $0.51 | 2.15% | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
$55.00 | -- | -- | -- | $0.89 | 1.97% | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
$30.08 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 4.33% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 0.932 | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | 0.730 | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | 1.226 | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | 0.741 | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | 1.023 | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | 1.336 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ASHR
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
SPDR S&P China ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or ASHR?
Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or ASHR?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or ASHR More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.838, which suggesting that the stock is 16.157% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF has a beta of 0.724, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.576%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or ASHR?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF offers a yield of 1.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or ASHR?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for Xtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- ASHRXtrackers Hvst CSI 300 China A-Shs ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or CXSE?
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or CXSE?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund0 0 0 -
Is GXC or CXSE More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.838, which suggesting that the stock is 16.157% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a beta of 0.927, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.261%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or CXSE?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund offers a yield of 1.5% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or CXSE?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or KBA?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or KBA?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or KBA More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.838, which suggesting that the stock is 16.157% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a beta of 0.677, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.318%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or KBA?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF offers a yield of 2.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or KBA?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or MCHI?
iShares MSCI China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares MSCI China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or MCHI?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares MSCI China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than iShares MSCI China ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than iShares MSCI China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or MCHI More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.838, which suggesting that the stock is 16.157% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares MSCI China ETF has a beta of 0.858, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.181%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or MCHI?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. iShares MSCI China ETF offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.89 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares MSCI China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or MCHI?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares MSCI China ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares MSCI China ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares MSCI China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for iShares MSCI China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- MCHIiShares MSCI China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or PGJ?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or PGJ?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or PGJ More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.838, which suggesting that the stock is 16.157% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.115, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.457%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or PGJ?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.45%. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF offers a yield of 4.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or PGJ?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is Rivian a Good Stock a Buy?
Rivian Automotive (RIVN) had an initial IPO of close to…
Will Chevron Acquire Hess?
Long-time Buffett favorite in the energy sector Chevron (NYSE:CVX) is…
Stock Ideas
Buy
58
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Sell
29
UNF alert for Mar 26
UniFirst [UNF] is up 0.24% over the past day.
Sell
30
KEQU alert for Mar 26
Kewaunee Scientific [KEQU] is down 1.45% over the past day.
Buy
82
EPAC alert for Mar 26
Enerpac Tool Group [EPAC] is down 3.19% over the past day.
