Is Uber Stock a Buy on the Dip?
Shares of Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) have been fading fast in…
Sell
34
GXC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$77.09
Seasonality move
:
0.03%
Day range:
$77.02 - $77.84
52-week range:
$59.45 - $97.17
Dividend yield:
2.75%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
23.7K
Avg. volume:
43.4K
1-year change:
17.79%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
$77.52 | -- | -- | -- | $1.50 | 2.75% | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
$30.68 | -- | -- | -- | $0.09 | 1.66% | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
$18.89 | -- | -- | -- | $0.41 | 2.8% | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
$23.91 | -- | -- | -- | $0.51 | 2.14% | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
$26.96 | -- | -- | -- | $0.07 | 4.56% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | 1.002 | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | 1.276 | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | 1.014 | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | 0.988 | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | 1.607 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GXC
SPDR S&P China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CXSE
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLCH
Franklin FTSE China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
KBA
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
PGJ
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
SPDR S&P China ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or CXSE?
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or CXSE?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund0 0 0 -
Is GXC or CXSE More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.802, which suggesting that the stock is 19.751% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund has a beta of 0.867, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.322%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or CXSE?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or CXSE?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for WisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- CXSEWisdomTree China ex-State-Owned Enterprises Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or FLCH?
Franklin FTSE China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat Franklin FTSE China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or FLCH?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Franklin FTSE China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than Franklin FTSE China ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than Franklin FTSE China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or FLCH More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.802, which suggesting that the stock is 19.751% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Franklin FTSE China ETF has a beta of 0.814, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.601%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or FLCH?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Franklin FTSE China ETF offers a yield of 2.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.41 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin FTSE China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or FLCH?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Franklin FTSE China ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than Franklin FTSE China ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Franklin FTSE China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for Franklin FTSE China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- FLCHFranklin FTSE China ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or KBA?
KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or KBA?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or KBA More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.802, which suggesting that the stock is 19.751% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF has a beta of 0.643, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.657%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or KBA?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF offers a yield of 2.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.51 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or KBA?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- KBAKraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Idx ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GXC or PGJ?
Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a net margin of -- compared to SPDR S&P China ETF's net margin of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About GXC or PGJ?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that SPDR S&P China ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF, analysts believe SPDR S&P China ETF is more attractive than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GXCSPDR S&P China ETF0 0 0 PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF0 0 0 -
Is GXC or PGJ More Risky?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a beta of 0.802, which suggesting that the stock is 19.751% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF has a beta of 1.061, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.144%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GXC or PGJ?
SPDR S&P China ETF has a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.75%. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF offers a yield of 4.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. SPDR S&P China ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GXC or PGJ?
SPDR S&P China ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF quarterly revenues of --. SPDR S&P China ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's net income of --. Notably, SPDR S&P China ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SPDR S&P China ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Golden Dragon China ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GXCSPDR S&P China ETF-- -- -- -- PGJInvesco Golden Dragon China ETF-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is AMD Stock an All-Time Buy?
Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) is a high-growth AI stock that…
How High Will Airbnb Stock Go?
Airbnb, Inc. (NASDAQ:ABNB) share price has seen substantial turbulence over…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 43x
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
57
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
64
ARQQ alert for Dec 27
Arqit Quantum [ARQQ] is down 3.22% over the past day.
Buy
64
QMCO alert for Dec 27
Quantum [QMCO] is up 4.72% over the past day.
Buy
65
ALGS alert for Dec 27
Aligos Therapeutics [ALGS] is down 4.82% over the past day.
