VVV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CDTi Advanced Materials has a net margin of 22.11% compared to Valvoline's net margin of --. Valvoline's return on equity of 209.65% beat CDTi Advanced Materials's return on equity of --.

Valvoline has a consensus price target of $43.19, signalling upside risk potential of 27%. On the other hand CDTi Advanced Materials has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 956.43%. Given that CDTi Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than Valvoline, analysts believe CDTi Advanced Materials is more attractive than Valvoline.

Valvoline has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CDTi Advanced Materials has a beta of -0.757, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 175.743%.

Valvoline has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CDTi Advanced Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Valvoline pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CDTi Advanced Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Valvoline quarterly revenues are $414.3M, which are larger than CDTi Advanced Materials quarterly revenues of --. Valvoline's net income of $91.6M is higher than CDTi Advanced Materials's net income of --. Notably, Valvoline's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while CDTi Advanced Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valvoline is 2.67x versus 0.05x for CDTi Advanced Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ChargePoint Holdings has a net margin of 22.11% compared to Valvoline's net margin of -57.71%. Valvoline's return on equity of 209.65% beat ChargePoint Holdings's return on equity of -119.95%.

Valvoline has a consensus price target of $43.19, signalling upside risk potential of 27%. On the other hand ChargePoint Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $1.55 which suggests that it could grow by 155.21%. Given that ChargePoint Holdings has higher upside potential than Valvoline, analysts believe ChargePoint Holdings is more attractive than Valvoline.

Valvoline has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ChargePoint Holdings has a beta of 2.054, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.418%.

Valvoline has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ChargePoint Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Valvoline pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ChargePoint Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Valvoline quarterly revenues are $414.3M, which are larger than ChargePoint Holdings quarterly revenues of $101.9M. Valvoline's net income of $91.6M is higher than ChargePoint Holdings's net income of -$58.8M. Notably, Valvoline's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while ChargePoint Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valvoline is 2.67x versus 0.63x for ChargePoint Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Driven Brands Holdings has a net margin of 22.11% compared to Valvoline's net margin of -55.3%. Valvoline's return on equity of 209.65% beat Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of -33.8%.

Valvoline has a consensus price target of $43.19, signalling upside risk potential of 27%. On the other hand Driven Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $20.08 which suggests that it could grow by 24.59%. Given that Valvoline has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe Valvoline is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

Valvoline has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Valvoline has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Driven Brands Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Valvoline pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Driven Brands Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Valvoline quarterly revenues are $414.3M, which are smaller than Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $564.1M. Valvoline's net income of $91.6M is higher than Driven Brands Holdings's net income of -$312M. Notably, Valvoline's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while Driven Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 391.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valvoline is 2.67x versus 1.11x for Driven Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mister Car Wash has a net margin of 22.11% compared to Valvoline's net margin of 3.65%. Valvoline's return on equity of 209.65% beat Mister Car Wash's return on equity of 7.36%.

Valvoline has a consensus price target of $43.19, signalling upside risk potential of 27%. On the other hand Mister Car Wash has an analysts' consensus of $9.53 which suggests that it could grow by 33.87%. Given that Mister Car Wash has higher upside potential than Valvoline, analysts believe Mister Car Wash is more attractive than Valvoline.

Valvoline has a beta of 1.324, which suggesting that the stock is 32.387% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mister Car Wash has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Valvoline has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mister Car Wash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Valvoline pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mister Car Wash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Valvoline quarterly revenues are $414.3M, which are larger than Mister Car Wash quarterly revenues of $251.2M. Valvoline's net income of $91.6M is higher than Mister Car Wash's net income of $9.2M. Notably, Valvoline's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.27x while Mister Car Wash's PE ratio is 32.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Valvoline is 2.67x versus 2.36x for Mister Car Wash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.