CHPT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CDTi Advanced Materials has a net margin of -57.71% compared to ChargePoint Holdings's net margin of --. ChargePoint Holdings's return on equity of -119.95% beat CDTi Advanced Materials's return on equity of --.

ChargePoint Holdings has a consensus price target of $1.55, signalling upside risk potential of 155.21%. On the other hand CDTi Advanced Materials has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 956.43%. Given that CDTi Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than ChargePoint Holdings, analysts believe CDTi Advanced Materials is more attractive than ChargePoint Holdings.

ChargePoint Holdings has a beta of 2.054, which suggesting that the stock is 105.418% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CDTi Advanced Materials has a beta of -0.757, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 175.743%.

ChargePoint Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CDTi Advanced Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ChargePoint Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CDTi Advanced Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ChargePoint Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.9M, which are larger than CDTi Advanced Materials quarterly revenues of --. ChargePoint Holdings's net income of -$58.8M is higher than CDTi Advanced Materials's net income of --. Notably, ChargePoint Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CDTi Advanced Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ChargePoint Holdings is 0.63x versus 0.05x for CDTi Advanced Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Driven Brands Holdings has a net margin of -57.71% compared to ChargePoint Holdings's net margin of -55.3%. ChargePoint Holdings's return on equity of -119.95% beat Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of -33.8%.

ChargePoint Holdings has a consensus price target of $1.55, signalling upside risk potential of 155.21%. On the other hand Driven Brands Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $20.08 which suggests that it could grow by 24.59%. Given that ChargePoint Holdings has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe ChargePoint Holdings is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

ChargePoint Holdings has a beta of 2.054, which suggesting that the stock is 105.418% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ChargePoint Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Driven Brands Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ChargePoint Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Driven Brands Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ChargePoint Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.9M, which are smaller than Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues of $564.1M. ChargePoint Holdings's net income of -$58.8M is higher than Driven Brands Holdings's net income of -$312M. Notably, ChargePoint Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Driven Brands Holdings's PE ratio is 391.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ChargePoint Holdings is 0.63x versus 1.11x for Driven Brands Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mister Car Wash has a net margin of -57.71% compared to ChargePoint Holdings's net margin of 3.65%. ChargePoint Holdings's return on equity of -119.95% beat Mister Car Wash's return on equity of 7.36%.

ChargePoint Holdings has a consensus price target of $1.55, signalling upside risk potential of 155.21%. On the other hand Mister Car Wash has an analysts' consensus of $9.53 which suggests that it could grow by 33.87%. Given that ChargePoint Holdings has higher upside potential than Mister Car Wash, analysts believe ChargePoint Holdings is more attractive than Mister Car Wash.

ChargePoint Holdings has a beta of 2.054, which suggesting that the stock is 105.418% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mister Car Wash has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

ChargePoint Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mister Car Wash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ChargePoint Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mister Car Wash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ChargePoint Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.9M, which are smaller than Mister Car Wash quarterly revenues of $251.2M. ChargePoint Holdings's net income of -$58.8M is lower than Mister Car Wash's net income of $9.2M. Notably, ChargePoint Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mister Car Wash's PE ratio is 32.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ChargePoint Holdings is 0.63x versus 2.36x for Mister Car Wash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valvoline has a net margin of -57.71% compared to ChargePoint Holdings's net margin of 22.11%. ChargePoint Holdings's return on equity of -119.95% beat Valvoline's return on equity of 209.65%.

ChargePoint Holdings has a consensus price target of $1.55, signalling upside risk potential of 155.21%. On the other hand Valvoline has an analysts' consensus of $43.19 which suggests that it could grow by 27%. Given that ChargePoint Holdings has higher upside potential than Valvoline, analysts believe ChargePoint Holdings is more attractive than Valvoline.

ChargePoint Holdings has a beta of 2.054, which suggesting that the stock is 105.418% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valvoline has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.387%.

ChargePoint Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Valvoline offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. ChargePoint Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Valvoline pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ChargePoint Holdings quarterly revenues are $101.9M, which are smaller than Valvoline quarterly revenues of $414.3M. ChargePoint Holdings's net income of -$58.8M is lower than Valvoline's net income of $91.6M. Notably, ChargePoint Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Valvoline's PE ratio is 16.27x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ChargePoint Holdings is 0.63x versus 2.67x for Valvoline. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.