DRVN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CDTi Advanced Materials has a net margin of -55.3% compared to Driven Brands Holdings's net margin of --. Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of -33.8% beat CDTi Advanced Materials's return on equity of --.

Driven Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.08, signalling upside risk potential of 24.74%. On the other hand CDTi Advanced Materials has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1114.29%. Given that CDTi Advanced Materials has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe CDTi Advanced Materials is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CDTi Advanced Materials has a beta of -0.757, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 175.743%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CDTi Advanced Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Driven Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CDTi Advanced Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $564.1M, which are larger than CDTi Advanced Materials quarterly revenues of --. Driven Brands Holdings's net income of -$312M is higher than CDTi Advanced Materials's net income of --. Notably, Driven Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 391.00x while CDTi Advanced Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Driven Brands Holdings is 1.11x versus 0.05x for CDTi Advanced Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ChargePoint Holdings has a net margin of -55.3% compared to Driven Brands Holdings's net margin of -57.71%. Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of -33.8% beat ChargePoint Holdings's return on equity of -119.95%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.08, signalling upside risk potential of 24.74%. On the other hand ChargePoint Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $1.57 which suggests that it could grow by 171.76%. Given that ChargePoint Holdings has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe ChargePoint Holdings is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ChargePoint Holdings has a beta of 2.054, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 105.418%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ChargePoint Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Driven Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ChargePoint Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $564.1M, which are larger than ChargePoint Holdings quarterly revenues of $101.9M. Driven Brands Holdings's net income of -$312M is lower than ChargePoint Holdings's net income of -$58.8M. Notably, Driven Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 391.00x while ChargePoint Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Driven Brands Holdings is 1.11x versus 0.60x for ChargePoint Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mister Car Wash has a net margin of -55.3% compared to Driven Brands Holdings's net margin of 3.65%. Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of -33.8% beat Mister Car Wash's return on equity of 7.36%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.08, signalling upside risk potential of 24.74%. On the other hand Mister Car Wash has an analysts' consensus of $9.53 which suggests that it could grow by 30.74%. Given that Mister Car Wash has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe Mister Car Wash is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mister Car Wash has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mister Car Wash offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Driven Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mister Car Wash pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $564.1M, which are larger than Mister Car Wash quarterly revenues of $251.2M. Driven Brands Holdings's net income of -$312M is lower than Mister Car Wash's net income of $9.2M. Notably, Driven Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 391.00x while Mister Car Wash's PE ratio is 33.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Driven Brands Holdings is 1.11x versus 2.41x for Mister Car Wash. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Valvoline has a net margin of -55.3% compared to Driven Brands Holdings's net margin of 22.11%. Driven Brands Holdings's return on equity of -33.8% beat Valvoline's return on equity of 209.65%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a consensus price target of $20.08, signalling upside risk potential of 24.74%. On the other hand Valvoline has an analysts' consensus of $43.19 which suggests that it could grow by 25.16%. Given that Valvoline has higher upside potential than Driven Brands Holdings, analysts believe Valvoline is more attractive than Driven Brands Holdings.

Driven Brands Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Valvoline has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.387%.

Driven Brands Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Valvoline offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Driven Brands Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Valvoline pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Driven Brands Holdings quarterly revenues are $564.1M, which are larger than Valvoline quarterly revenues of $414.3M. Driven Brands Holdings's net income of -$312M is lower than Valvoline's net income of $91.6M. Notably, Driven Brands Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 391.00x while Valvoline's PE ratio is 16.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Driven Brands Holdings is 1.11x versus 2.71x for Valvoline. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.