STEM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Constellation Energy has a net margin of -506.3% compared to Stem's net margin of 18.32%. Stem's return on equity of -595.48% beat Constellation Energy's return on equity of 24.01%.

Stem has a consensus price target of $1.88, signalling upside risk potential of 478.88%. On the other hand Constellation Energy has an analysts' consensus of $279.12 which suggests that it could grow by 21.47%. Given that Stem has higher upside potential than Constellation Energy, analysts believe Stem is more attractive than Constellation Energy.

Stem has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Stem has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Constellation Energy offers a yield of 0.61% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Stem pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Energy pays out 22.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stem quarterly revenues are $29.3M, which are smaller than Constellation Energy quarterly revenues of $6.6B. Stem's net income of -$148.3M is lower than Constellation Energy's net income of $1.2B. Notably, Stem's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Constellation Energy's PE ratio is 25.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stem is 0.20x versus 3.04x for Constellation Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fluence Energy has a net margin of -506.3% compared to Stem's net margin of 3.9%. Stem's return on equity of -595.48% beat Fluence Energy's return on equity of 4.1%.

Stem has a consensus price target of $1.88, signalling upside risk potential of 478.88%. On the other hand Fluence Energy has an analysts' consensus of $26.77 which suggests that it could grow by 65.96%. Given that Stem has higher upside potential than Fluence Energy, analysts believe Stem is more attractive than Fluence Energy.

Stem has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fluence Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Stem has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fluence Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stem pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fluence Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stem quarterly revenues are $29.3M, which are smaller than Fluence Energy quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Stem's net income of -$148.3M is lower than Fluence Energy's net income of $47.8M. Notably, Stem's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Fluence Energy's PE ratio is 120.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stem is 0.20x versus 0.84x for Fluence Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ormat Technologies has a net margin of -506.3% compared to Stem's net margin of 10.43%. Stem's return on equity of -595.48% beat Ormat Technologies's return on equity of 4.79%.

Stem has a consensus price target of $1.88, signalling upside risk potential of 478.88%. On the other hand Ormat Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $85.13 which suggests that it could grow by 21.17%. Given that Stem has higher upside potential than Ormat Technologies, analysts believe Stem is more attractive than Ormat Technologies.

Stem has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ormat Technologies has a beta of 0.531, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.88%.

Stem has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ormat Technologies offers a yield of 0.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. Stem pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ormat Technologies pays out 22.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Ormat Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Stem quarterly revenues are $29.3M, which are smaller than Ormat Technologies quarterly revenues of $211.8M. Stem's net income of -$148.3M is lower than Ormat Technologies's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Stem's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Ormat Technologies's PE ratio is 35.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stem is 0.20x versus 4.79x for Ormat Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of -506.3% compared to Stem's net margin of 30.27%. Stem's return on equity of -595.48% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of --.

Stem has a consensus price target of $1.88, signalling upside risk potential of 478.88%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $120.00 which suggests that it could grow by 21.63%. Given that Stem has higher upside potential than Talen Energy, analysts believe Stem is more attractive than Talen Energy.

Stem has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Stem has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Stem pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Stem quarterly revenues are $29.3M, which are smaller than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $555M. Stem's net income of -$148.3M is lower than Talen Energy's net income of $168M. Notably, Stem's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Talen Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Stem is 0.20x versus -- for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.