CEG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GE Vernova has a net margin of 15.83% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 4.58%. Constellation Energy's return on equity of 30.68% beat GE Vernova's return on equity of 15.67%.

Constellation Energy has a consensus price target of $300.26, signalling upside risk potential of 44.18%. On the other hand GE Vernova has an analysts' consensus of $401.24 which suggests that it could grow by 24.83%. Given that Constellation Energy has higher upside potential than GE Vernova, analysts believe Constellation Energy is more attractive than GE Vernova.

Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GE Vernova has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Constellation Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. GE Vernova offers a yield of 0.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Constellation Energy pays 11.84% of its earnings as a dividend. GE Vernova pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Energy quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are smaller than GE Vernova quarterly revenues of $10.6B. Constellation Energy's net income of $852M is higher than GE Vernova's net income of $484M. Notably, Constellation Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.51x while GE Vernova's PE ratio is 57.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Energy is 2.79x versus 2.55x for GE Vernova. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Oklo has a net margin of 15.83% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of --. Constellation Energy's return on equity of 30.68% beat Oklo's return on equity of --.

Constellation Energy has a consensus price target of $300.26, signalling upside risk potential of 44.18%. On the other hand Oklo has an analysts' consensus of $48.49 which suggests that it could grow by 115.5%. Given that Oklo has higher upside potential than Constellation Energy, analysts believe Oklo is more attractive than Constellation Energy.

Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oklo has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Constellation Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Oklo offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellation Energy pays 11.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Oklo pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Energy quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are larger than Oklo quarterly revenues of --. Constellation Energy's net income of $852M is higher than Oklo's net income of -$10.3M. Notably, Constellation Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.51x while Oklo's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Energy is 2.79x versus -- for Oklo. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Talen Energy has a net margin of 15.83% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 16.8%. Constellation Energy's return on equity of 30.68% beat Talen Energy's return on equity of 29.37%.

Constellation Energy has a consensus price target of $300.26, signalling upside risk potential of 44.18%. On the other hand Talen Energy has an analysts' consensus of $258.44 which suggests that it could grow by 30.5%. Given that Constellation Energy has higher upside potential than Talen Energy, analysts believe Constellation Energy is more attractive than Talen Energy.

Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Talen Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Constellation Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Talen Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellation Energy pays 11.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Talen Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Constellation Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Energy quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are larger than Talen Energy quarterly revenues of $488M. Constellation Energy's net income of $852M is higher than Talen Energy's net income of $82M. Notably, Constellation Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.51x while Talen Energy's PE ratio is 17.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Energy is 2.79x versus 5.30x for Talen Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Vistra has a net margin of 15.83% compared to Constellation Energy's net margin of 10.92%. Constellation Energy's return on equity of 30.68% beat Vistra's return on equity of 38.93%.

Constellation Energy has a consensus price target of $300.26, signalling upside risk potential of 44.18%. On the other hand Vistra has an analysts' consensus of $167.89 which suggests that it could grow by 50.29%. Given that Vistra has higher upside potential than Constellation Energy, analysts believe Vistra is more attractive than Constellation Energy.

Constellation Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Vistra has a beta of 1.216, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.619%.

Constellation Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.69%. Vistra offers a yield of 0.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Constellation Energy pays 11.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Vistra pays out 17.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellation Energy quarterly revenues are $5.4B, which are larger than Vistra quarterly revenues of $4B. Constellation Energy's net income of $852M is higher than Vistra's net income of $441M. Notably, Constellation Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.51x while Vistra's PE ratio is 15.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellation Energy is 2.79x versus 2.27x for Vistra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.