ADN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Alliant Energy has a net margin of -1400.37% compared to Advent Technologies Holdings's net margin of 27.29%. Advent Technologies Holdings's return on equity of -325.95% beat Alliant Energy's return on equity of 9.7%.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 212.5%. On the other hand Alliant Energy has an analysts' consensus of $62.49 which suggests that it could grow by 5.99%. Given that Advent Technologies Holdings has higher upside potential than Alliant Energy, analysts believe Advent Technologies Holdings is more attractive than Alliant Energy.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a beta of 0.396, which suggesting that the stock is 60.393% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alliant Energy has a beta of 0.589, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.115%.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alliant Energy offers a yield of 3.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.48 per share. Advent Technologies Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alliant Energy pays out 64.87% of its earnings as a dividend. Alliant Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Advent Technologies Holdings quarterly revenues are $805K, which are smaller than Alliant Energy quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Advent Technologies Holdings's net income of -$11.3M is lower than Alliant Energy's net income of $295M. Notably, Advent Technologies Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Alliant Energy's PE ratio is 22.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Advent Technologies Holdings is 1.44x versus 3.81x for Alliant Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Otter Tail has a net margin of -1400.37% compared to Advent Technologies Holdings's net margin of 25.29%. Advent Technologies Holdings's return on equity of -325.95% beat Otter Tail's return on equity of 20.19%.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 212.5%. On the other hand Otter Tail has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.8%. Given that Advent Technologies Holdings has higher upside potential than Otter Tail, analysts believe Advent Technologies Holdings is more attractive than Otter Tail.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a beta of 0.396, which suggesting that the stock is 60.393% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Otter Tail has a beta of 0.545, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.475%.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Otter Tail offers a yield of 2.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Advent Technologies Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Otter Tail pays out 24.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Otter Tail's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Advent Technologies Holdings quarterly revenues are $805K, which are smaller than Otter Tail quarterly revenues of $338M. Advent Technologies Holdings's net income of -$11.3M is lower than Otter Tail's net income of $85.5M. Notably, Advent Technologies Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Otter Tail's PE ratio is 10.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Advent Technologies Holdings is 1.44x versus 2.36x for Otter Tail. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Verde Clean Fuels has a net margin of -1400.37% compared to Advent Technologies Holdings's net margin of --. Advent Technologies Holdings's return on equity of -325.95% beat Verde Clean Fuels's return on equity of --.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 212.5%. On the other hand Verde Clean Fuels has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Advent Technologies Holdings has higher upside potential than Verde Clean Fuels, analysts believe Advent Technologies Holdings is more attractive than Verde Clean Fuels.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a beta of 0.396, which suggesting that the stock is 60.393% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Verde Clean Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Verde Clean Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Advent Technologies Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Verde Clean Fuels pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Advent Technologies Holdings quarterly revenues are $805K, which are larger than Verde Clean Fuels quarterly revenues of --. Advent Technologies Holdings's net income of -$11.3M is lower than Verde Clean Fuels's net income of -$777.7K. Notably, Advent Technologies Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Verde Clean Fuels's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Advent Technologies Holdings is 1.44x versus -- for Verde Clean Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Xcel Energy has a net margin of -1400.37% compared to Advent Technologies Holdings's net margin of 18.72%. Advent Technologies Holdings's return on equity of -325.95% beat Xcel Energy's return on equity of 10.44%.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 212.5%. On the other hand Xcel Energy has an analysts' consensus of $72.39 which suggests that it could grow by 7.4%. Given that Advent Technologies Holdings has higher upside potential than Xcel Energy, analysts believe Advent Technologies Holdings is more attractive than Xcel Energy.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a beta of 0.396, which suggesting that the stock is 60.393% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Xcel Energy has a beta of 0.410, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 58.995%.

Advent Technologies Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Xcel Energy offers a yield of 3.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. Advent Technologies Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Xcel Energy pays out 61.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Xcel Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Advent Technologies Holdings quarterly revenues are $805K, which are smaller than Xcel Energy quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Advent Technologies Holdings's net income of -$11.3M is lower than Xcel Energy's net income of $682M. Notably, Advent Technologies Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Xcel Energy's PE ratio is 20.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Advent Technologies Holdings is 1.44x versus 2.73x for Xcel Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.