SJT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CKX Lands has a net margin of 57.45% compared to San Juan Basin Royalty Trust's net margin of 31.6%. San Juan Basin Royalty Trust's return on equity of 463.82% beat CKX Lands's return on equity of 2.51%.

San Juan Basin Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CKX Lands has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that San Juan Basin Royalty Trust has higher upside potential than CKX Lands, analysts believe San Juan Basin Royalty Trust is more attractive than CKX Lands.

San Juan Basin Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.574% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CKX Lands has a beta of 0.009, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 99.133%.

San Juan Basin Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.17%. CKX Lands offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. San Juan Basin Royalty Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CKX Lands pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

San Juan Basin Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are larger than CKX Lands quarterly revenues of $171.3K. San Juan Basin Royalty Trust's net income of -- is lower than CKX Lands's net income of $54.1K. Notably, San Juan Basin Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.27x while CKX Lands's PE ratio is 53.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for San Juan Basin Royalty Trust is 12.84x versus 11.95x for CKX Lands. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Dorchester Minerals LP has a net margin of 57.45% compared to San Juan Basin Royalty Trust's net margin of 68.1%. San Juan Basin Royalty Trust's return on equity of 463.82% beat Dorchester Minerals LP's return on equity of 51.55%.

San Juan Basin Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Dorchester Minerals LP has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that San Juan Basin Royalty Trust has higher upside potential than Dorchester Minerals LP, analysts believe San Juan Basin Royalty Trust is more attractive than Dorchester Minerals LP.

San Juan Basin Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.574% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Dorchester Minerals LP has a beta of 1.093, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.33%.

San Juan Basin Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.17%. Dorchester Minerals LP offers a yield of 10.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share. San Juan Basin Royalty Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Dorchester Minerals LP pays out 119.05% of its earnings as a dividend.

San Juan Basin Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than Dorchester Minerals LP quarterly revenues of $53.5M. San Juan Basin Royalty Trust's net income of -- is lower than Dorchester Minerals LP's net income of $36.4M. Notably, San Juan Basin Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.27x while Dorchester Minerals LP's PE ratio is 12.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for San Juan Basin Royalty Trust is 12.84x versus 7.82x for Dorchester Minerals LP. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evolution Petroleum has a net margin of 57.45% compared to San Juan Basin Royalty Trust's net margin of 9.43%. San Juan Basin Royalty Trust's return on equity of 463.82% beat Evolution Petroleum's return on equity of 5.54%.

San Juan Basin Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Evolution Petroleum has an analysts' consensus of $7.63 which suggests that it could grow by 43.33%. Given that Evolution Petroleum has higher upside potential than San Juan Basin Royalty Trust, analysts believe Evolution Petroleum is more attractive than San Juan Basin Royalty Trust.

San Juan Basin Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.574% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evolution Petroleum has a beta of 0.880, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.953%.

San Juan Basin Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.17%. Evolution Petroleum offers a yield of 9.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.12 per share. San Juan Basin Royalty Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Evolution Petroleum pays out 393.14% of its earnings as a dividend.

San Juan Basin Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are smaller than Evolution Petroleum quarterly revenues of $21.9M. San Juan Basin Royalty Trust's net income of -- is lower than Evolution Petroleum's net income of $2.1M. Notably, San Juan Basin Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.27x while Evolution Petroleum's PE ratio is 38.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for San Juan Basin Royalty Trust is 12.84x versus 2.01x for Evolution Petroleum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Houston American Energy has a net margin of 57.45% compared to San Juan Basin Royalty Trust's net margin of -111.16%. San Juan Basin Royalty Trust's return on equity of 463.82% beat Houston American Energy's return on equity of -32.89%.

San Juan Basin Royalty Trust has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Houston American Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that San Juan Basin Royalty Trust has higher upside potential than Houston American Energy, analysts believe San Juan Basin Royalty Trust is more attractive than Houston American Energy.

San Juan Basin Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.864, which suggesting that the stock is 13.574% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Houston American Energy has a beta of 0.486, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.45%.

San Juan Basin Royalty Trust has a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share corresponding to a yield of 8.17%. Houston American Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. San Juan Basin Royalty Trust pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Houston American Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

San Juan Basin Royalty Trust quarterly revenues are $1.9M, which are larger than Houston American Energy quarterly revenues of $130.2K. San Juan Basin Royalty Trust's net income of -- is higher than Houston American Energy's net income of -$144.8K. Notably, San Juan Basin Royalty Trust's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.27x while Houston American Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for San Juan Basin Royalty Trust is 12.84x versus 26.23x for Houston American Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.