DMLP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

PrimeEnergy Resources has a net margin of 68.1% compared to Dorchester Minerals LP's net margin of 33.12%. Dorchester Minerals LP's return on equity of 51.55% beat PrimeEnergy Resources's return on equity of 33.66%.

Dorchester Minerals LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PrimeEnergy Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Dorchester Minerals LP has higher upside potential than PrimeEnergy Resources, analysts believe Dorchester Minerals LP is more attractive than PrimeEnergy Resources.

Dorchester Minerals LP has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PrimeEnergy Resources has a beta of 0.540, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 46.039%.

Dorchester Minerals LP has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.33%. PrimeEnergy Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Dorchester Minerals LP pays 119.05% of its earnings as a dividend. PrimeEnergy Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dorchester Minerals LP quarterly revenues are $53.5M, which are smaller than PrimeEnergy Resources quarterly revenues of $66.7M. Dorchester Minerals LP's net income of $36.4M is higher than PrimeEnergy Resources's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Dorchester Minerals LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.10x while PrimeEnergy Resources's PE ratio is 8.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dorchester Minerals LP is 7.82x versus 2.54x for PrimeEnergy Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a net margin of 68.1% compared to Dorchester Minerals LP's net margin of -72.12%. Dorchester Minerals LP's return on equity of 51.55% beat Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -18.89%.

Dorchester Minerals LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Patterson-UTI Energy has an analysts' consensus of $10.73 which suggests that it could grow by 27.47%. Given that Patterson-UTI Energy has higher upside potential than Dorchester Minerals LP, analysts believe Patterson-UTI Energy is more attractive than Dorchester Minerals LP.

Dorchester Minerals LP has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 2.095, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 109.534%.

Dorchester Minerals LP has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.33%. Patterson-UTI Energy offers a yield of 3.8% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Dorchester Minerals LP pays 119.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy pays out 40.62% of its earnings as a dividend. Patterson-UTI Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Dorchester Minerals LP's is not.

Dorchester Minerals LP quarterly revenues are $53.5M, which are smaller than Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Dorchester Minerals LP's net income of $36.4M is higher than Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$978.8M. Notably, Dorchester Minerals LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.10x while Patterson-UTI Energy's PE ratio is 36.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dorchester Minerals LP is 7.82x versus 0.59x for Patterson-UTI Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

San Juan Basin Royalty Trust has a net margin of 68.1% compared to Dorchester Minerals LP's net margin of 57.45%. Dorchester Minerals LP's return on equity of 51.55% beat San Juan Basin Royalty Trust's return on equity of 463.82%.

Dorchester Minerals LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand San Juan Basin Royalty Trust has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Dorchester Minerals LP has higher upside potential than San Juan Basin Royalty Trust, analysts believe Dorchester Minerals LP is more attractive than San Juan Basin Royalty Trust.

Dorchester Minerals LP has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison San Juan Basin Royalty Trust has a beta of 0.864, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.574%.

Dorchester Minerals LP has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.33%. San Juan Basin Royalty Trust offers a yield of 8.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Dorchester Minerals LP pays 119.05% of its earnings as a dividend. San Juan Basin Royalty Trust pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Dorchester Minerals LP quarterly revenues are $53.5M, which are larger than San Juan Basin Royalty Trust quarterly revenues of $1.9M. Dorchester Minerals LP's net income of $36.4M is higher than San Juan Basin Royalty Trust's net income of --. Notably, Dorchester Minerals LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.10x while San Juan Basin Royalty Trust's PE ratio is 21.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dorchester Minerals LP is 7.82x versus 12.59x for San Juan Basin Royalty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Viper Energy has a net margin of 68.1% compared to Dorchester Minerals LP's net margin of 23.36%. Dorchester Minerals LP's return on equity of 51.55% beat Viper Energy's return on equity of 7.18%.

Dorchester Minerals LP has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Viper Energy has an analysts' consensus of $59.07 which suggests that it could grow by 16.12%. Given that Viper Energy has higher upside potential than Dorchester Minerals LP, analysts believe Viper Energy is more attractive than Dorchester Minerals LP.

Dorchester Minerals LP has a beta of 1.093, which suggesting that the stock is 9.33% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Viper Energy has a beta of 1.733, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.321%.

Dorchester Minerals LP has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 10.33%. Viper Energy offers a yield of 4.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.61 per share. Dorchester Minerals LP pays 119.05% of its earnings as a dividend. Viper Energy pays out 162.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Dorchester Minerals LP quarterly revenues are $53.5M, which are smaller than Viper Energy quarterly revenues of $209.4M. Dorchester Minerals LP's net income of $36.4M is lower than Viper Energy's net income of $48.9M. Notably, Dorchester Minerals LP's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.10x while Viper Energy's PE ratio is 21.49x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Dorchester Minerals LP is 7.82x versus 5.30x for Viper Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.