PTEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Berry Corp (bry) has a net margin of -4.44% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of -0.91%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -22.8% beat Berry Corp (bry)'s return on equity of 2.69%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $10.77, signalling upside risk potential of 28.48%. On the other hand Berry Corp (bry) has an analysts' consensus of $5.90 which suggests that it could grow by 84.95%. Given that Berry Corp (bry) has higher upside potential than Patterson-UTI Energy, analysts believe Berry Corp (bry) is more attractive than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Berry Corp (bry) has a beta of 1.341, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.096%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.82%. Berry Corp (bry) offers a yield of 10.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.03 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Berry Corp (bry) pays out 254.68% of its earnings as a dividend.

Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Berry Corp (bry) quarterly revenues of $193.5M. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$51.6M is lower than Berry Corp (bry)'s net income of -$1.8M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Berry Corp (bry)'s PE ratio is 12.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.62x versus 0.31x for Berry Corp (bry). Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Helmerich & Payne has a net margin of -4.44% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of 8.09%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -22.8% beat Helmerich & Payne's return on equity of 10.63%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $10.77, signalling upside risk potential of 28.48%. On the other hand Helmerich & Payne has an analysts' consensus of $34.40 which suggests that it could grow by 29.81%. Given that Helmerich & Payne has higher upside potential than Patterson-UTI Energy, analysts believe Helmerich & Payne is more attractive than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Helmerich & Payne has a beta of 1.005, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.45500000000001%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.82%. Helmerich & Payne offers a yield of 5.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne pays out 48.95% of its earnings as a dividend. Helmerich & Payne's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Helmerich & Payne quarterly revenues of $677.3M. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$51.6M is lower than Helmerich & Payne's net income of $54.8M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Helmerich & Payne's PE ratio is 8.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.62x versus 0.95x for Helmerich & Payne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Noble Corp PLC has a net margin of -4.44% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of 10.42%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -22.8% beat Noble Corp PLC's return on equity of 10.6%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $10.77, signalling upside risk potential of 28.48%. On the other hand Noble Corp PLC has an analysts' consensus of $36.82 which suggests that it could grow by 50.52%. Given that Noble Corp PLC has higher upside potential than Patterson-UTI Energy, analysts believe Noble Corp PLC is more attractive than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noble Corp PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.82%. Noble Corp PLC offers a yield of 7.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Noble Corp PLC pays out 61.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Noble Corp PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Noble Corp PLC quarterly revenues of $927.3M. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$51.6M is lower than Noble Corp PLC's net income of $96.6M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Noble Corp PLC's PE ratio is 8.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.62x versus 1.21x for Noble Corp PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seadrill has a net margin of -4.44% compared to Patterson-UTI Energy's net margin of 34.95%. Patterson-UTI Energy's return on equity of -22.8% beat Seadrill's return on equity of 15.07%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a consensus price target of $10.77, signalling upside risk potential of 28.48%. On the other hand Seadrill has an analysts' consensus of $48.63 which suggests that it could grow by 89.87%. Given that Seadrill has higher upside potential than Patterson-UTI Energy, analysts believe Seadrill is more attractive than Patterson-UTI Energy.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a beta of 1.599, which suggesting that the stock is 59.906% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seadrill has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Patterson-UTI Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.82%. Seadrill offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Patterson-UTI Energy pays -13.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Seadrill pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Patterson-UTI Energy quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Seadrill quarterly revenues of $289M. Patterson-UTI Energy's net income of -$51.6M is lower than Seadrill's net income of $101M. Notably, Patterson-UTI Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 36.81x while Seadrill's PE ratio is 4.05x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Patterson-UTI Energy is 0.62x versus 1.30x for Seadrill. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.