RNST Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadence Bank has a net margin of 24.34% compared to Renasant's net margin of 30.5%. Renasant's return on equity of 7.75% beat Cadence Bank's return on equity of 12.69%.

Renasant has a consensus price target of $39.92, signalling upside risk potential of 25.33%. On the other hand Cadence Bank has an analysts' consensus of $34.36 which suggests that it could grow by 19.11%. Given that Renasant has higher upside potential than Cadence Bank, analysts believe Renasant is more attractive than Cadence Bank.

Renasant has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.333% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadence Bank has a beta of 0.870, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.952%.

Renasant has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Cadence Bank offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Renasant pays 27.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Cadence Bank pays out 36.69% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Renasant quarterly revenues are $170.6M, which are smaller than Cadence Bank quarterly revenues of $447.4M. Renasant's net income of $41.5M is lower than Cadence Bank's net income of $136.4M. Notably, Renasant's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.89x while Cadence Bank's PE ratio is 10.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renasant is 2.94x versus 2.99x for Cadence Bank. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 24.34% compared to Renasant's net margin of 20.42%. Renasant's return on equity of 7.75% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 6.65%.

Renasant has a consensus price target of $39.92, signalling upside risk potential of 25.33%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $45.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.57%. Given that Renasant has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe Renasant is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

Renasant has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.333% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.462%.

Renasant has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Renasant pays 27.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Renasant quarterly revenues are $170.6M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18.3M. Renasant's net income of $41.5M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $3.7M. Notably, Renasant's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.89x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 18.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renasant is 2.94x versus 3.10x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 24.34% compared to Renasant's net margin of 28.72%. Renasant's return on equity of 7.75% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.67%.

Renasant has a consensus price target of $39.92, signalling upside risk potential of 25.33%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $170.00 which suggests that it could grow by 15.05%. Given that Renasant has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Renasant is more attractive than Park National.

Renasant has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.333% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.722, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.76%.

Renasant has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Park National offers a yield of 2.88% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. Renasant pays 27.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Renasant quarterly revenues are $170.6M, which are larger than Park National quarterly revenues of $134.5M. Renasant's net income of $41.5M is higher than Park National's net income of $38.6M. Notably, Renasant's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.89x while Park National's PE ratio is 15.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renasant is 2.94x versus 4.61x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 24.34% compared to Renasant's net margin of 25.81%. Renasant's return on equity of 7.75% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.27%.

Renasant has a consensus price target of $39.92, signalling upside risk potential of 25.33%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $76.50 which suggests that it could grow by 29.18%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Renasant, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Renasant.

Renasant has a beta of 0.927, which suggesting that the stock is 7.333% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.748, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.208%.

Renasant has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.76%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 4.15% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Renasant pays 27.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Renasant quarterly revenues are $170.6M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $76.2M. Renasant's net income of $41.5M is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, Renasant's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.89x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 11.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Renasant is 2.94x versus 2.86x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.