MTG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cincinnati Financial has a net margin of 65.21% compared to MGIC Investment's net margin of 24.7%. MGIC Investment's return on equity of 14.99% beat Cincinnati Financial's return on equity of 24.78%.

MGIC Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.19%. On the other hand Cincinnati Financial has an analysts' consensus of $156.33 which suggests that it could grow by 8.14%. Given that MGIC Investment has higher upside potential than Cincinnati Financial, analysts believe MGIC Investment is more attractive than Cincinnati Financial.

MGIC Investment has a beta of 1.270, which suggesting that the stock is 27.022% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cincinnati Financial has a beta of 0.692, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.78%.

MGIC Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Cincinnati Financial offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.81 per share. MGIC Investment pays 17.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Cincinnati Financial pays out 24.63% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGIC Investment quarterly revenues are $306.6M, which are smaller than Cincinnati Financial quarterly revenues of $3.3B. MGIC Investment's net income of $200M is lower than Cincinnati Financial's net income of $820M. Notably, MGIC Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.33x while Cincinnati Financial's PE ratio is 7.43x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGIC Investment is 5.37x versus 1.88x for Cincinnati Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Hartford Financial Services Group has a net margin of 65.21% compared to MGIC Investment's net margin of 11.42%. MGIC Investment's return on equity of 14.99% beat The Hartford Financial Services Group's return on equity of 19.63%.

MGIC Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.19%. On the other hand The Hartford Financial Services Group has an analysts' consensus of $129.29 which suggests that it could grow by 18.11%. Given that The Hartford Financial Services Group has higher upside potential than MGIC Investment, analysts believe The Hartford Financial Services Group is more attractive than MGIC Investment.

MGIC Investment has a beta of 1.270, which suggesting that the stock is 27.022% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Hartford Financial Services Group has a beta of 0.951, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.912%.

MGIC Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. The Hartford Financial Services Group offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. MGIC Investment pays 17.25% of its earnings as a dividend. The Hartford Financial Services Group pays out 21.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGIC Investment quarterly revenues are $306.6M, which are smaller than The Hartford Financial Services Group quarterly revenues of $6.7B. MGIC Investment's net income of $200M is lower than The Hartford Financial Services Group's net income of $767M. Notably, MGIC Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.33x while The Hartford Financial Services Group's PE ratio is 10.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGIC Investment is 5.37x versus 1.27x for The Hartford Financial Services Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radian Group has a net margin of 65.21% compared to MGIC Investment's net margin of 45.56%. MGIC Investment's return on equity of 14.99% beat Radian Group's return on equity of 13.51%.

MGIC Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.19%. On the other hand Radian Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.44%. Given that Radian Group has higher upside potential than MGIC Investment, analysts believe Radian Group is more attractive than MGIC Investment.

MGIC Investment has a beta of 1.270, which suggesting that the stock is 27.022% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radian Group has a beta of 1.036, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.628%.

MGIC Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Radian Group offers a yield of 3.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. MGIC Investment pays 17.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Radian Group pays out 24.19% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MGIC Investment quarterly revenues are $306.6M, which are smaller than Radian Group quarterly revenues of $333.4M. MGIC Investment's net income of $200M is higher than Radian Group's net income of $151.9M. Notably, MGIC Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.33x while Radian Group's PE ratio is 8.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGIC Investment is 5.37x versus 3.82x for Radian Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safety Insurance Group has a net margin of 65.21% compared to MGIC Investment's net margin of 8.89%. MGIC Investment's return on equity of 14.99% beat Safety Insurance Group's return on equity of 9.26%.

MGIC Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.19%. On the other hand Safety Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -14.76%. Given that MGIC Investment has higher upside potential than Safety Insurance Group, analysts believe MGIC Investment is more attractive than Safety Insurance Group.

MGIC Investment has a beta of 1.270, which suggesting that the stock is 27.022% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safety Insurance Group has a beta of 0.191, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.899%.

MGIC Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.07%. Safety Insurance Group offers a yield of 4.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.90 per share. MGIC Investment pays 17.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Safety Insurance Group pays out 282.34% of its earnings as a dividend. MGIC Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Safety Insurance Group's is not.

MGIC Investment quarterly revenues are $306.6M, which are larger than Safety Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $291.1M. MGIC Investment's net income of $200M is higher than Safety Insurance Group's net income of $25.9M. Notably, MGIC Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.33x while Safety Insurance Group's PE ratio is 16.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MGIC Investment is 5.37x versus 1.12x for Safety Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.