JBTM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Graham has a net margin of -- compared to JBT Marel's net margin of 6.13%. JBT Marel's return on equity of -- beat Graham's return on equity of 7.3%.

JBT Marel has a consensus price target of $129.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.76%. On the other hand Graham has an analysts' consensus of $52.17 which suggests that it could grow by 21.69%. Given that Graham has higher upside potential than JBT Marel, analysts believe Graham is more attractive than JBT Marel.

JBT Marel has a beta of 1.227, which suggesting that the stock is 22.688% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graham has a beta of 0.728, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.227%.

JBT Marel has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.33%. Graham offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JBT Marel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graham pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

JBT Marel quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Graham quarterly revenues of $53.6M. JBT Marel's net income of -- is lower than Graham's net income of $3.3M. Notably, JBT Marel's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.63x while Graham's PE ratio is 60.38x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JBT Marel is 2.32x versus 2.40x for Graham. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Luxfer Holdings PLC has a net margin of -- compared to JBT Marel's net margin of 12.78%. JBT Marel's return on equity of -- beat Luxfer Holdings PLC's return on equity of 4.29%.

JBT Marel has a consensus price target of $129.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.76%. On the other hand Luxfer Holdings PLC has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 32.81%. Given that Luxfer Holdings PLC has higher upside potential than JBT Marel, analysts believe Luxfer Holdings PLC is more attractive than JBT Marel.

JBT Marel has a beta of 1.227, which suggesting that the stock is 22.688% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Luxfer Holdings PLC has a beta of 0.883, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.742%.

JBT Marel has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.33%. Luxfer Holdings PLC offers a yield of 4.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. JBT Marel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Luxfer Holdings PLC pays out -736.84% of its earnings as a dividend.

JBT Marel quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Luxfer Holdings PLC quarterly revenues of $99.4M. JBT Marel's net income of -- is lower than Luxfer Holdings PLC's net income of $12.7M. Notably, JBT Marel's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.63x while Luxfer Holdings PLC's PE ratio is 37.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JBT Marel is 2.32x versus 0.90x for Luxfer Holdings PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The Middleby has a net margin of -- compared to JBT Marel's net margin of 12.11%. JBT Marel's return on equity of -- beat The Middleby's return on equity of 11.77%.

JBT Marel has a consensus price target of $129.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.76%. On the other hand The Middleby has an analysts' consensus of $160.57 which suggests that it could grow by 11.89%. Given that The Middleby has higher upside potential than JBT Marel, analysts believe The Middleby is more attractive than JBT Marel.

JBT Marel has a beta of 1.227, which suggesting that the stock is 22.688% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Middleby has a beta of 1.613, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 61.27%.

JBT Marel has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.33%. The Middleby offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JBT Marel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Middleby pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

JBT Marel quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than The Middleby quarterly revenues of $942.8M. JBT Marel's net income of -- is lower than The Middleby's net income of $114.2M. Notably, JBT Marel's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.63x while The Middleby's PE ratio is 19.21x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JBT Marel is 2.32x versus 1.95x for The Middleby. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of -- compared to JBT Marel's net margin of -161.83%. JBT Marel's return on equity of -- beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48%.

JBT Marel has a consensus price target of $129.00, signalling upside risk potential of 5.76%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that JBT Marel has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe JBT Marel is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

JBT Marel has a beta of 1.227, which suggesting that the stock is 22.688% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.632, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 163.201%.

JBT Marel has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.33%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. JBT Marel pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

JBT Marel quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.4M. JBT Marel's net income of -- is lower than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, JBT Marel's price-to-earnings ratio is 22.63x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for JBT Marel is 2.32x versus 9.67x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.