GHM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kadant has a net margin of 6.13% compared to Graham's net margin of 11.63%. Graham's return on equity of 7.3% beat Kadant's return on equity of 14.42%.

Graham has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.26%. On the other hand Kadant has an analysts' consensus of $341.67 which suggests that it could fall by -1.56%. Given that Graham has higher upside potential than Kadant, analysts believe Graham is more attractive than Kadant.

Graham has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.359% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kadant has a beta of 1.255, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.464%.

Graham has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kadant offers a yield of 0.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. Graham pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kadant pays out 11.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Kadant's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graham quarterly revenues are $53.6M, which are smaller than Kadant quarterly revenues of $271.6M. Graham's net income of $3.3M is lower than Kadant's net income of $31.6M. Notably, Graham's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.41x while Kadant's PE ratio is 35.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham is 2.28x versus 3.95x for Kadant. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Parker Hannifin has a net margin of 6.13% compared to Graham's net margin of 14.24%. Graham's return on equity of 7.3% beat Parker Hannifin's return on equity of 24.73%.

Graham has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.26%. On the other hand Parker Hannifin has an analysts' consensus of $741.41 which suggests that it could grow by 14.56%. Given that Graham has higher upside potential than Parker Hannifin, analysts believe Graham is more attractive than Parker Hannifin.

Graham has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.359% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Parker Hannifin has a beta of 1.436, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.595%.

Graham has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Parker Hannifin offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.63 per share. Graham pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Parker Hannifin pays out 27.5% of its earnings as a dividend. Parker Hannifin's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graham quarterly revenues are $53.6M, which are smaller than Parker Hannifin quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Graham's net income of $3.3M is lower than Parker Hannifin's net income of $698.4M. Notably, Graham's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.41x while Parker Hannifin's PE ratio is 29.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham is 2.28x versus 4.23x for Parker Hannifin. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

RBC Bearings has a net margin of 6.13% compared to Graham's net margin of 13.62%. Graham's return on equity of 7.3% beat RBC Bearings's return on equity of 8.13%.

Graham has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.26%. On the other hand RBC Bearings has an analysts' consensus of $338.20 which suggests that it could grow by 10.42%. Given that Graham has higher upside potential than RBC Bearings, analysts believe Graham is more attractive than RBC Bearings.

Graham has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.359% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RBC Bearings has a beta of 1.548, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.815%.

Graham has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. RBC Bearings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graham pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Bearings pays out 10.96% of its earnings as a dividend. RBC Bearings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graham quarterly revenues are $53.6M, which are smaller than RBC Bearings quarterly revenues of $397.9M. Graham's net income of $3.3M is lower than RBC Bearings's net income of $54.2M. Notably, Graham's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.41x while RBC Bearings's PE ratio is 44.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham is 2.28x versus 5.63x for RBC Bearings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regal Rexnord has a net margin of 6.13% compared to Graham's net margin of 4.92%. Graham's return on equity of 7.3% beat Regal Rexnord's return on equity of 3.33%.

Graham has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 22.26%. On the other hand Regal Rexnord has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 33.69%. Given that Regal Rexnord has higher upside potential than Graham, analysts believe Regal Rexnord is more attractive than Graham.

Graham has a beta of 0.726, which suggesting that the stock is 27.359% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regal Rexnord has a beta of 0.992, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.79900000000001%.

Graham has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Regal Rexnord offers a yield of 0.9% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Graham pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord pays out -161.67% of its earnings as a dividend.

Graham quarterly revenues are $53.6M, which are smaller than Regal Rexnord quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Graham's net income of $3.3M is lower than Regal Rexnord's net income of $72.7M. Notably, Graham's price-to-earnings ratio is 57.41x while Regal Rexnord's PE ratio is 49.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham is 2.28x versus 1.68x for Regal Rexnord. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.