GHM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Enerpac Tool Group has a net margin of 3.38% compared to Graham's net margin of 14.36%. Graham's return on equity of 8.43% beat Enerpac Tool Group's return on equity of 24.44%.

Graham has a consensus price target of $52.67, signalling upside risk potential of 66.98%. On the other hand Enerpac Tool Group has an analysts' consensus of $56.00 which suggests that it could grow by 39.2%. Given that Graham has higher upside potential than Enerpac Tool Group, analysts believe Graham is more attractive than Enerpac Tool Group.

Graham has a beta of 0.649, which suggesting that the stock is 35.117% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Enerpac Tool Group has a beta of 1.083, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.267%.

Graham has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Enerpac Tool Group offers a yield of 0.1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Graham pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enerpac Tool Group pays out 2.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Enerpac Tool Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graham quarterly revenues are $47M, which are smaller than Enerpac Tool Group quarterly revenues of $145.5M. Graham's net income of $1.6M is lower than Enerpac Tool Group's net income of $20.9M. Notably, Graham's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.00x while Enerpac Tool Group's PE ratio is 23.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham is 1.74x versus 3.68x for Enerpac Tool Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graco has a net margin of 3.38% compared to Graham's net margin of 23.49%. Graham's return on equity of 8.43% beat Graco's return on equity of 19.79%.

Graham has a consensus price target of $52.67, signalling upside risk potential of 66.98%. On the other hand Graco has an analysts' consensus of $89.41 which suggests that it could grow by 9.9%. Given that Graham has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Graham is more attractive than Graco.

Graham has a beta of 0.649, which suggesting that the stock is 35.117% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graco has a beta of 0.916, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.38%.

Graham has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Graco offers a yield of 1.3% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Graham pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graco pays out 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Graco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graham quarterly revenues are $47M, which are smaller than Graco quarterly revenues of $528.3M. Graham's net income of $1.6M is lower than Graco's net income of $124.1M. Notably, Graham's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.00x while Graco's PE ratio is 28.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham is 1.74x versus 6.52x for Graco. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gorman-Rupp has a net margin of 3.38% compared to Graham's net margin of 7.4%. Graham's return on equity of 8.43% beat Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 12.08%.

Graham has a consensus price target of $52.67, signalling upside risk potential of 66.98%. On the other hand Gorman-Rupp has an analysts' consensus of $53.00 which suggests that it could grow by 49.63%. Given that Graham has higher upside potential than Gorman-Rupp, analysts believe Graham is more attractive than Gorman-Rupp.

Graham has a beta of 0.649, which suggesting that the stock is 35.117% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 1.047, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.692%.

Graham has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gorman-Rupp offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Graham pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gorman-Rupp pays out 47.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Gorman-Rupp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graham quarterly revenues are $47M, which are smaller than Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues of $163.9M. Graham's net income of $1.6M is lower than Gorman-Rupp's net income of $12.1M. Notably, Graham's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.00x while Gorman-Rupp's PE ratio is 20.96x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham is 1.74x versus 1.40x for Gorman-Rupp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mueller Water Products has a net margin of 3.38% compared to Graham's net margin of 11.6%. Graham's return on equity of 8.43% beat Mueller Water Products's return on equity of 17.46%.

Graham has a consensus price target of $52.67, signalling upside risk potential of 66.98%. On the other hand Mueller Water Products has an analysts' consensus of $28.67 which suggests that it could grow by 9.42%. Given that Graham has higher upside potential than Mueller Water Products, analysts believe Graham is more attractive than Mueller Water Products.

Graham has a beta of 0.649, which suggesting that the stock is 35.117% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mueller Water Products has a beta of 1.265, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.463%.

Graham has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mueller Water Products offers a yield of 1% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share. Graham pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products pays out 34.43% of its earnings as a dividend. Mueller Water Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graham quarterly revenues are $47M, which are smaller than Mueller Water Products quarterly revenues of $304.3M. Graham's net income of $1.6M is lower than Mueller Water Products's net income of $35.3M. Notably, Graham's price-to-earnings ratio is 38.00x while Mueller Water Products's PE ratio is 30.47x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graham is 1.74x versus 3.02x for Mueller Water Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.