GGG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crane has a net margin of 19.81% compared to Graco's net margin of 20.9%. Graco's return on equity of 20.13% beat Crane's return on equity of 19.75%.

Graco has a consensus price target of $90.26, signalling upside risk potential of 9.84%. On the other hand Crane has an analysts' consensus of $179.02 which suggests that it could grow by 17.22%. Given that Crane has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Crane is more attractive than Graco.

Graco has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 16.997% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crane has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Crane offers a yield of 0.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share. Graco pays 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Crane pays out 15.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $548.7M, which are larger than Crane quarterly revenues of $387.5M. Graco's net income of $108.7M is higher than Crane's net income of $81M. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.14x while Crane's PE ratio is 30.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.70x versus 4.18x for Crane. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flowserve has a net margin of 19.81% compared to Graco's net margin of 6.57%. Graco's return on equity of 20.13% beat Flowserve's return on equity of 13.94%.

Graco has a consensus price target of $90.26, signalling upside risk potential of 9.84%. On the other hand Flowserve has an analysts' consensus of $71.50 which suggests that it could grow by 41.39%. Given that Flowserve has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Flowserve is more attractive than Graco.

Graco has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 16.997% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flowserve has a beta of 1.426, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.584%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Flowserve offers a yield of 1.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Graco pays 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Flowserve pays out 39.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $548.7M, which are smaller than Flowserve quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Graco's net income of $108.7M is higher than Flowserve's net income of $77.5M. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.14x while Flowserve's PE ratio is 23.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.70x versus 1.47x for Flowserve. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Graham has a net margin of 19.81% compared to Graco's net margin of 3.38%. Graco's return on equity of 20.13% beat Graham's return on equity of 8.43%.

Graco has a consensus price target of $90.26, signalling upside risk potential of 9.84%. On the other hand Graham has an analysts' consensus of $52.67 which suggests that it could grow by 70.61%. Given that Graham has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Graham is more attractive than Graco.

Graco has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 16.997% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Graham has a beta of 0.730, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.966%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Graham offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Graco pays 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Graham pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Graco's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $548.7M, which are larger than Graham quarterly revenues of $47M. Graco's net income of $108.7M is higher than Graham's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.14x while Graham's PE ratio is 37.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.70x versus 1.70x for Graham. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gorman-Rupp has a net margin of 19.81% compared to Graco's net margin of 6.75%. Graco's return on equity of 20.13% beat Gorman-Rupp's return on equity of 11.13%.

Graco has a consensus price target of $90.26, signalling upside risk potential of 9.84%. On the other hand Gorman-Rupp has an analysts' consensus of $53.00 which suggests that it could grow by 50.61%. Given that Gorman-Rupp has higher upside potential than Graco, analysts believe Gorman-Rupp is more attractive than Graco.

Graco has a beta of 0.830, which suggesting that the stock is 16.997% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gorman-Rupp has a beta of 0.940, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.02%.

Graco has a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.27%. Gorman-Rupp offers a yield of 2.08% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. Graco pays 35.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Gorman-Rupp pays out 47.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Graco quarterly revenues are $548.7M, which are larger than Gorman-Rupp quarterly revenues of $162.7M. Graco's net income of $108.7M is higher than Gorman-Rupp's net income of $11M. Notably, Graco's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.14x while Gorman-Rupp's PE ratio is 23.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Graco is 6.70x versus 1.40x for Gorman-Rupp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.