OPTT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadwind has a net margin of -814.55% compared to Ocean Power Technologies's net margin of -2.72%. Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45% beat Broadwind's return on equity of 1.97%.

Ocean Power Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Broadwind has an analysts' consensus of $4.00 which suggests that it could grow by 177.78%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.567, which suggesting that the stock is 156.665% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadwind has a beta of 1.703, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.295%.

Ocean Power Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadwind offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ocean Power Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadwind pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues are $825K, which are smaller than Broadwind quarterly revenues of $33.6M. Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M is lower than Broadwind's net income of -$914K. Notably, Ocean Power Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Broadwind's PE ratio is 26.99x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ocean Power Technologies is 8.62x versus 0.22x for Broadwind. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CVD Equipment has a net margin of -814.55% compared to Ocean Power Technologies's net margin of 1.78%. Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45% beat CVD Equipment's return on equity of -5.35%.

Ocean Power Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CVD Equipment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 424.59%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.567, which suggesting that the stock is 156.665% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.09%.

Ocean Power Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVD Equipment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ocean Power Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues are $825K, which are smaller than CVD Equipment quarterly revenues of $7.4M. Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M is lower than CVD Equipment's net income of $132K. Notably, Ocean Power Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CVD Equipment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ocean Power Technologies is 8.62x versus 0.77x for CVD Equipment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intevac has a net margin of -814.55% compared to Ocean Power Technologies's net margin of -289.48%. Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45% beat Intevac's return on equity of -37.3%.

Ocean Power Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intevac has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 73.7%. Given that Intevac has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Intevac is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.567, which suggesting that the stock is 156.665% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intevac has a beta of 0.619, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.118%.

Ocean Power Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intevac offers a yield of 1.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Ocean Power Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intevac pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues are $825K, which are smaller than Intevac quarterly revenues of $11.3M. Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M is higher than Intevac's net income of -$32.8M. Notably, Ocean Power Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intevac's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ocean Power Technologies is 8.62x versus 1.69x for Intevac. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of -814.55% compared to Ocean Power Technologies's net margin of -11.09%. Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.54%.

Ocean Power Technologies has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 341.25%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.567, which suggesting that the stock is 156.665% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.953%.

Ocean Power Technologies has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ocean Power Technologies pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues are $825K, which are smaller than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $20.9M. Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M is lower than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Ocean Power Technologies's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ocean Power Technologies is 8.62x versus 0.21x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.