BWEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CVD Equipment has a net margin of -2.72% compared to Broadwind's net margin of 1.78%. Broadwind's return on equity of 1.97% beat CVD Equipment's return on equity of -7.53%.

Broadwind has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 179.72%. On the other hand CVD Equipment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 429.8%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Broadwind, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Broadwind.

Broadwind has a beta of 1.703, which suggesting that the stock is 70.295% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.331, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.09%.

Broadwind has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVD Equipment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind quarterly revenues are $33.6M, which are larger than CVD Equipment quarterly revenues of $7.4M. Broadwind's net income of -$914K is lower than CVD Equipment's net income of $132K. Notably, Broadwind's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.81x while CVD Equipment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind is 0.22x versus 0.77x for CVD Equipment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intevac has a net margin of -2.72% compared to Broadwind's net margin of -289.48%. Broadwind's return on equity of 1.97% beat Intevac's return on equity of -37.3%.

Broadwind has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 179.72%. On the other hand Intevac has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 75.44%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Intevac, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Intevac.

Broadwind has a beta of 1.703, which suggesting that the stock is 70.295% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intevac has a beta of 0.619, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.118%.

Broadwind has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intevac offers a yield of 1.25% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Broadwind pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intevac pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind quarterly revenues are $33.6M, which are larger than Intevac quarterly revenues of $11.3M. Broadwind's net income of -$914K is higher than Intevac's net income of -$32.8M. Notably, Broadwind's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.81x while Intevac's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind is 0.22x versus 1.67x for Intevac. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of -2.72% compared to Broadwind's net margin of -814.55%. Broadwind's return on equity of 1.97% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -92.45%.

Broadwind has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 179.72%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Broadwind has a beta of 1.703, which suggesting that the stock is 70.295% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.567, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 156.665%.

Broadwind has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind quarterly revenues are $33.6M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $825K. Broadwind's net income of -$914K is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Broadwind's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.81x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind is 0.22x versus 8.81x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of -2.72% compared to Broadwind's net margin of -11.09%. Broadwind's return on equity of 1.97% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -13.54%.

Broadwind has a consensus price target of $4.00, signalling upside risk potential of 179.72%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 342.83%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Broadwind, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Broadwind.

Broadwind has a beta of 1.703, which suggesting that the stock is 70.295% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.260, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.953%.

Broadwind has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind quarterly revenues are $33.6M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $20.9M. Broadwind's net income of -$914K is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, Broadwind's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.81x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind is 0.22x versus 0.21x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.