JBI Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mestek has a net margin of 0.13% compared to Janus International Group's net margin of --. Janus International Group's return on equity of 13.25% beat Mestek's return on equity of --.

Janus International Group has a consensus price target of $10.10, signalling upside risk potential of 54.91%. On the other hand Mestek has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Janus International Group has higher upside potential than Mestek, analysts believe Janus International Group is more attractive than Mestek.

Janus International Group has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.359% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mestek has a beta of 0.392, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 60.833%.

Janus International Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mestek offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Janus International Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mestek pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Janus International Group quarterly revenues are $230.8M, which are larger than Mestek quarterly revenues of --. Janus International Group's net income of $300K is higher than Mestek's net income of --. Notably, Janus International Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.58x while Mestek's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Janus International Group is 0.98x versus 0.61x for Mestek. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanex Building Products has a net margin of 0.13% compared to Janus International Group's net margin of -3.72%. Janus International Group's return on equity of 13.25% beat Quanex Building Products's return on equity of 1.61%.

Janus International Group has a consensus price target of $10.10, signalling upside risk potential of 54.91%. On the other hand Quanex Building Products has an analysts' consensus of $34.75 which suggests that it could grow by 113.98%. Given that Quanex Building Products has higher upside potential than Janus International Group, analysts believe Quanex Building Products is more attractive than Janus International Group.

Janus International Group has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.359% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanex Building Products has a beta of 1.085, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.548%.

Janus International Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quanex Building Products offers a yield of 1.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Janus International Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products pays out 36.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Janus International Group quarterly revenues are $230.8M, which are smaller than Quanex Building Products quarterly revenues of $400M. Janus International Group's net income of $300K is higher than Quanex Building Products's net income of -$14.9M. Notably, Janus International Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.58x while Quanex Building Products's PE ratio is 26.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Janus International Group is 0.98x versus 0.45x for Quanex Building Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Holdings has a net margin of 0.13% compared to Janus International Group's net margin of -211.96%. Janus International Group's return on equity of 13.25% beat Safe & Green Holdings's return on equity of -886.67%.

Janus International Group has a consensus price target of $10.10, signalling upside risk potential of 54.91%. On the other hand Safe & Green Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 53233.33%. Given that Safe & Green Holdings has higher upside potential than Janus International Group, analysts believe Safe & Green Holdings is more attractive than Janus International Group.

Janus International Group has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.359% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Holdings has a beta of 0.566, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.36%.

Janus International Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safe & Green Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Janus International Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Janus International Group quarterly revenues are $230.8M, which are larger than Safe & Green Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.8M. Janus International Group's net income of $300K is higher than Safe & Green Holdings's net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Janus International Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.58x while Safe & Green Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Janus International Group is 0.98x versus 0.16x for Safe & Green Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Techprecision has a net margin of 0.13% compared to Janus International Group's net margin of -18.28%. Janus International Group's return on equity of 13.25% beat Techprecision's return on equity of -71.07%.

Janus International Group has a consensus price target of $10.10, signalling upside risk potential of 54.91%. On the other hand Techprecision has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Janus International Group has higher upside potential than Techprecision, analysts believe Janus International Group is more attractive than Techprecision.

Janus International Group has a beta of 1.094, which suggesting that the stock is 9.359% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Techprecision has a beta of 0.134, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.621%.

Janus International Group has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Techprecision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Janus International Group pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Techprecision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Janus International Group quarterly revenues are $230.8M, which are larger than Techprecision quarterly revenues of $8M. Janus International Group's net income of $300K is higher than Techprecision's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Janus International Group's price-to-earnings ratio is 13.58x while Techprecision's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Janus International Group is 0.98x versus 0.59x for Techprecision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.