AP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Mestek has a net margin of -2.04% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of --. Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity of -56.15% beat Mestek's return on equity of --.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 147.53%. On the other hand Mestek has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ampco-Pittsburgh has higher upside potential than Mestek, analysts believe Ampco-Pittsburgh is more attractive than Mestek.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mestek has a beta of 0.518, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.185%.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mestek offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ampco-Pittsburgh pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mestek pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ampco-Pittsburgh quarterly revenues are $96.2M, which are larger than Mestek quarterly revenues of --. Ampco-Pittsburgh's net income of -$2M is higher than Mestek's net income of --. Notably, Ampco-Pittsburgh's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mestek's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ampco-Pittsburgh is 0.09x versus 0.61x for Mestek. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanex Building Products has a net margin of -2.04% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -2.83%. Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity of -56.15% beat Quanex Building Products's return on equity of 5.05%.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 147.53%. On the other hand Quanex Building Products has an analysts' consensus of $36.33 which suggests that it could grow by 44.29%. Given that Ampco-Pittsburgh has higher upside potential than Quanex Building Products, analysts believe Ampco-Pittsburgh is more attractive than Quanex Building Products.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanex Building Products has a beta of 1.245, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.538%.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quanex Building Products offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Ampco-Pittsburgh pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products pays out 36.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Ampco-Pittsburgh quarterly revenues are $96.2M, which are smaller than Quanex Building Products quarterly revenues of $492.2M. Ampco-Pittsburgh's net income of -$2M is higher than Quanex Building Products's net income of -$13.9M. Notably, Ampco-Pittsburgh's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quanex Building Products's PE ratio is 22.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ampco-Pittsburgh is 0.09x versus 0.72x for Quanex Building Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Holdings has a net margin of -2.04% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -211.96%. Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity of -56.15% beat Safe & Green Holdings's return on equity of -886.67%.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 147.53%. On the other hand Safe & Green Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 40762.66%. Given that Safe & Green Holdings has higher upside potential than Ampco-Pittsburgh, analysts believe Safe & Green Holdings is more attractive than Ampco-Pittsburgh.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Holdings has a beta of -2.746, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 374.602%.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safe & Green Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ampco-Pittsburgh pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ampco-Pittsburgh quarterly revenues are $96.2M, which are larger than Safe & Green Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.8M. Ampco-Pittsburgh's net income of -$2M is higher than Safe & Green Holdings's net income of -$3.7M. Notably, Ampco-Pittsburgh's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Safe & Green Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ampco-Pittsburgh is 0.09x versus 0.08x for Safe & Green Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Techprecision has a net margin of -2.04% compared to Ampco-Pittsburgh's net margin of -18.28%. Ampco-Pittsburgh's return on equity of -56.15% beat Techprecision's return on equity of -71.07%.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 147.53%. On the other hand Techprecision has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ampco-Pittsburgh has higher upside potential than Techprecision, analysts believe Ampco-Pittsburgh is more attractive than Techprecision.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.816% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Techprecision has a beta of 0.194, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.553%.

Ampco-Pittsburgh has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Techprecision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ampco-Pittsburgh pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Techprecision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Ampco-Pittsburgh quarterly revenues are $96.2M, which are larger than Techprecision quarterly revenues of $8M. Ampco-Pittsburgh's net income of -$2M is lower than Techprecision's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Ampco-Pittsburgh's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Techprecision's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ampco-Pittsburgh is 0.09x versus 1.04x for Techprecision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.