SGBX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Janus International Group has a net margin of -211.96% compared to Safe & Green Holdings's net margin of 5.13%. Safe & Green Holdings's return on equity of -886.67% beat Janus International Group's return on equity of 20.21%.

Safe & Green Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 39261.47%. On the other hand Janus International Group has an analysts' consensus of $9.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.11%. Given that Safe & Green Holdings has higher upside potential than Janus International Group, analysts believe Safe & Green Holdings is more attractive than Janus International Group.

Safe & Green Holdings has a beta of -2.746, which suggesting that the stock is 374.602% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Janus International Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Safe & Green Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Janus International Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Safe & Green Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Janus International Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Safe & Green Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.8M, which are smaller than Janus International Group quarterly revenues of $230.1M. Safe & Green Holdings's net income of -$3.7M is lower than Janus International Group's net income of $11.8M. Notably, Safe & Green Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Janus International Group's PE ratio is 10.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Holdings is 0.08x versus 1.12x for Janus International Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mestek has a net margin of -211.96% compared to Safe & Green Holdings's net margin of --. Safe & Green Holdings's return on equity of -886.67% beat Mestek's return on equity of --.

Safe & Green Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 39261.47%. On the other hand Mestek has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Safe & Green Holdings has higher upside potential than Mestek, analysts believe Safe & Green Holdings is more attractive than Mestek.

Safe & Green Holdings has a beta of -2.746, which suggesting that the stock is 374.602% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mestek has a beta of 0.518, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 48.185%.

Safe & Green Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mestek offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Safe & Green Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mestek pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Safe & Green Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.8M, which are larger than Mestek quarterly revenues of --. Safe & Green Holdings's net income of -$3.7M is higher than Mestek's net income of --. Notably, Safe & Green Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mestek's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Holdings is 0.08x versus 0.61x for Mestek. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Quanex Building Products has a net margin of -211.96% compared to Safe & Green Holdings's net margin of -2.83%. Safe & Green Holdings's return on equity of -886.67% beat Quanex Building Products's return on equity of 5.05%.

Safe & Green Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 39261.47%. On the other hand Quanex Building Products has an analysts' consensus of $36.33 which suggests that it could grow by 43.95%. Given that Safe & Green Holdings has higher upside potential than Quanex Building Products, analysts believe Safe & Green Holdings is more attractive than Quanex Building Products.

Safe & Green Holdings has a beta of -2.746, which suggesting that the stock is 374.602% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Quanex Building Products has a beta of 1.245, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.538%.

Safe & Green Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Quanex Building Products offers a yield of 1.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Safe & Green Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products pays out 36.21% of its earnings as a dividend. Quanex Building Products's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Safe & Green Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.8M, which are smaller than Quanex Building Products quarterly revenues of $492.2M. Safe & Green Holdings's net income of -$3.7M is higher than Quanex Building Products's net income of -$13.9M. Notably, Safe & Green Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Quanex Building Products's PE ratio is 22.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Holdings is 0.08x versus 0.72x for Quanex Building Products. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Techprecision has a net margin of -211.96% compared to Safe & Green Holdings's net margin of -18.28%. Safe & Green Holdings's return on equity of -886.67% beat Techprecision's return on equity of -71.07%.

Safe & Green Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 39261.47%. On the other hand Techprecision has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Safe & Green Holdings has higher upside potential than Techprecision, analysts believe Safe & Green Holdings is more attractive than Techprecision.

Safe & Green Holdings has a beta of -2.746, which suggesting that the stock is 374.602% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Techprecision has a beta of 0.194, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 80.553%.

Safe & Green Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Techprecision offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Safe & Green Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Techprecision pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Safe & Green Holdings quarterly revenues are $1.8M, which are smaller than Techprecision quarterly revenues of $8M. Safe & Green Holdings's net income of -$3.7M is lower than Techprecision's net income of -$1.5M. Notably, Safe & Green Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Techprecision's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Safe & Green Holdings is 0.08x versus 1.01x for Techprecision. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.