FBK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a net margin of 28.58% compared to FB Financial's net margin of 24.62%. FB Financial's return on equity of 7.67% beat Burke & Herbert Financial Services's return on equity of 6.39%.

FB Financial has a consensus price target of $60.40, signalling upside risk potential of 24.56%. On the other hand Burke & Herbert Financial Services has an analysts' consensus of $79.00 which suggests that it could grow by 34.63%. Given that Burke & Herbert Financial Services has higher upside potential than FB Financial, analysts believe Burke & Herbert Financial Services is more attractive than FB Financial.

FB Financial has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.36% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Burke & Herbert Financial Services has a beta of 0.159, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.131%.

FB Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Burke & Herbert Financial Services offers a yield of 3.68% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. FB Financial pays 27.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Burke & Herbert Financial Services pays out 80.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FB Financial quarterly revenues are $132.5M, which are larger than Burke & Herbert Financial Services quarterly revenues of $80.4M. FB Financial's net income of $37.9M is higher than Burke & Herbert Financial Services's net income of $19.8M. Notably, FB Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.63x while Burke & Herbert Financial Services's PE ratio is 24.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FB Financial is 4.96x versus 2.84x for Burke & Herbert Financial Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 28.58% compared to FB Financial's net margin of 20.42%. FB Financial's return on equity of 7.67% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 6.65%.

FB Financial has a consensus price target of $60.40, signalling upside risk potential of 24.56%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $50.05 which suggests that it could grow by 26.13%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than FB Financial, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than FB Financial.

FB Financial has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.36% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.973, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.735%.

FB Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. FB Financial pays 27.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FB Financial quarterly revenues are $132.5M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18.3M. FB Financial's net income of $37.9M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $3.7M. Notably, FB Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.63x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 18.46x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FB Financial is 4.96x versus 3.18x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 28.58% compared to FB Financial's net margin of 28.72%. FB Financial's return on equity of 7.67% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.67%.

FB Financial has a consensus price target of $60.40, signalling upside risk potential of 24.56%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $177.83 which suggests that it could grow by 13.4%. Given that FB Financial has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe FB Financial is more attractive than Park National.

FB Financial has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.36% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.722, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.832%.

FB Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Park National offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. FB Financial pays 27.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FB Financial quarterly revenues are $132.5M, which are smaller than Park National quarterly revenues of $134.5M. FB Financial's net income of $37.9M is lower than Park National's net income of $38.6M. Notably, FB Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.63x while Park National's PE ratio is 16.84x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FB Financial is 4.96x versus 4.89x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 28.58% compared to FB Financial's net margin of 25.81%. FB Financial's return on equity of 7.67% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 10.27%.

FB Financial has a consensus price target of $60.40, signalling upside risk potential of 24.56%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of $76.50 which suggests that it could grow by 17.84%. Given that FB Financial has higher upside potential than Tompkins Financial, analysts believe FB Financial is more attractive than Tompkins Financial.

FB Financial has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.36% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.729, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.136%.

FB Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.44%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.79% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. FB Financial pays 27.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 49.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

FB Financial quarterly revenues are $132.5M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $76.2M. FB Financial's net income of $37.9M is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $19.7M. Notably, FB Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.63x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 13.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FB Financial is 4.96x versus 3.14x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.