CSTM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Century Aluminum has a net margin of 0.12% compared to Constellium SE's net margin of 8.77%. Constellium SE's return on equity of 10.74% beat Century Aluminum's return on equity of 63.58%.

Constellium SE has a consensus price target of $24.70, signalling upside risk potential of 75.89%. On the other hand Century Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $24.33 which suggests that it could grow by 32.75%. Given that Constellium SE has higher upside potential than Century Aluminum, analysts believe Constellium SE is more attractive than Century Aluminum.

Constellium SE has a beta of 1.972, which suggesting that the stock is 97.244% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.496, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 149.576%.

Constellium SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Century Aluminum offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellium SE pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Century Aluminum pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Constellium SE quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Century Aluminum quarterly revenues of $539.1M. Constellium SE's net income of $2.2M is lower than Century Aluminum's net income of $47.3M. Notably, Constellium SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.05x while Century Aluminum's PE ratio is 6.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellium SE is 0.21x versus 0.83x for Century Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuse Group Holding has a net margin of 0.12% compared to Constellium SE's net margin of --. Constellium SE's return on equity of 10.74% beat Fuse Group Holding's return on equity of --.

Constellium SE has a consensus price target of $24.70, signalling upside risk potential of 75.89%. On the other hand Fuse Group Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Constellium SE has higher upside potential than Fuse Group Holding, analysts believe Constellium SE is more attractive than Fuse Group Holding.

Constellium SE has a beta of 1.972, which suggesting that the stock is 97.244% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuse Group Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Constellium SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fuse Group Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Constellium SE pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fuse Group Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Constellium SE quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Fuse Group Holding quarterly revenues of --. Constellium SE's net income of $2.2M is higher than Fuse Group Holding's net income of --. Notably, Constellium SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.05x while Fuse Group Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellium SE is 0.21x versus -- for Fuse Group Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 0.12% compared to Constellium SE's net margin of 1.61%. Constellium SE's return on equity of 10.74% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.2%.

Constellium SE has a consensus price target of $24.70, signalling upside risk potential of 75.89%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $67.33 which suggests that it could grow by 16.08%. Given that Constellium SE has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Constellium SE is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Constellium SE has a beta of 1.972, which suggesting that the stock is 97.244% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.328, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.793%.

Constellium SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Constellium SE pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 106.78% of its earnings as a dividend.

Constellium SE quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $747.7M. Constellium SE's net income of $2.2M is lower than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $12M. Notably, Constellium SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.05x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 24.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellium SE is 0.21x versus 0.38x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 0.12% compared to Constellium SE's net margin of 7.32%. Constellium SE's return on equity of 10.74% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 19.51%.

Constellium SE has a consensus price target of $24.70, signalling upside risk potential of 75.89%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $139.10 which suggests that it could grow by 20.16%. Given that Constellium SE has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Constellium SE is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Constellium SE has a beta of 1.972, which suggesting that the stock is 97.244% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.310, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.033%.

Constellium SE has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Constellium SE pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 11.07% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Constellium SE quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Constellium SE's net income of $2.2M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $317.8M. Notably, Constellium SE's price-to-earnings ratio is 14.05x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 10.48x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Constellium SE is 0.21x versus 1.03x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.