UEC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coterra Energy has a net margin of -117.97% compared to Uranium Energy's net margin of 18.54%. Uranium Energy's return on equity of -6.88% beat Coterra Energy's return on equity of 9.54%.

Uranium Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 55.37%. On the other hand Coterra Energy has an analysts' consensus of $33.03 which suggests that it could grow by 39.47%. Given that Uranium Energy has higher upside potential than Coterra Energy, analysts believe Uranium Energy is more attractive than Coterra Energy.

Uranium Energy has a beta of 1.842, which suggesting that the stock is 84.195% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coterra Energy has a beta of 0.265, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.457%.

Uranium Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Coterra Energy offers a yield of 3.55% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Uranium Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Coterra Energy pays out 54.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Coterra Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uranium Energy quarterly revenues are $17.1M, which are smaller than Coterra Energy quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Uranium Energy's net income of -$20.2M is lower than Coterra Energy's net income of $252M. Notably, Uranium Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Coterra Energy's PE ratio is 14.35x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uranium Energy is 44.24x versus 3.14x for Coterra Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HighPeak Energy has a net margin of -117.97% compared to Uranium Energy's net margin of 18.39%. Uranium Energy's return on equity of -6.88% beat HighPeak Energy's return on equity of 11.71%.

Uranium Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 55.37%. On the other hand HighPeak Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 61.92%. Given that HighPeak Energy has higher upside potential than Uranium Energy, analysts believe HighPeak Energy is more attractive than Uranium Energy.

Uranium Energy has a beta of 1.842, which suggesting that the stock is 84.195% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HighPeak Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Uranium Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HighPeak Energy offers a yield of 1.14% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Uranium Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HighPeak Energy pays out 6.08% of its earnings as a dividend. HighPeak Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Uranium Energy quarterly revenues are $17.1M, which are smaller than HighPeak Energy quarterly revenues of $271.6M. Uranium Energy's net income of -$20.2M is lower than HighPeak Energy's net income of $49.9M. Notably, Uranium Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HighPeak Energy's PE ratio is 10.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uranium Energy is 44.24x versus 1.60x for HighPeak Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLX Energy Services Holdings has a net margin of -117.97% compared to Uranium Energy's net margin of -4.34%. Uranium Energy's return on equity of -6.88% beat KLX Energy Services Holdings's return on equity of -205.53%.

Uranium Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 55.37%. On the other hand KLX Energy Services Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 124.72%. Given that KLX Energy Services Holdings has higher upside potential than Uranium Energy, analysts believe KLX Energy Services Holdings is more attractive than Uranium Energy.

Uranium Energy has a beta of 1.842, which suggesting that the stock is 84.195% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLX Energy Services Holdings has a beta of 2.120, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.046%.

Uranium Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KLX Energy Services Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uranium Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. KLX Energy Services Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uranium Energy quarterly revenues are $17.1M, which are smaller than KLX Energy Services Holdings quarterly revenues of $188.9M. Uranium Energy's net income of -$20.2M is lower than KLX Energy Services Holdings's net income of -$8.2M. Notably, Uranium Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while KLX Energy Services Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uranium Energy is 44.24x versus 0.10x for KLX Energy Services Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Centrus Energy has a net margin of -117.97% compared to Uranium Energy's net margin of -8.67%. Uranium Energy's return on equity of -6.88% beat Centrus Energy's return on equity of 194.26%.

Uranium Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 55.37%. On the other hand Centrus Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 68.66%. Given that Centrus Energy has higher upside potential than Uranium Energy, analysts believe Centrus Energy is more attractive than Uranium Energy.

Uranium Energy has a beta of 1.842, which suggesting that the stock is 84.195% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Centrus Energy has a beta of 1.122, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 12.216%.

Uranium Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Centrus Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Uranium Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Centrus Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Uranium Energy quarterly revenues are $17.1M, which are smaller than Centrus Energy quarterly revenues of $57.7M. Uranium Energy's net income of -$20.2M is lower than Centrus Energy's net income of -$5M. Notably, Uranium Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Centrus Energy's PE ratio is 13.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Uranium Energy is 44.24x versus 2.73x for Centrus Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.