PUMP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Core Laboratories has a net margin of -5.32% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of 5.73%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -14.92% beat Core Laboratories's return on equity of 12.8%.

ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $10.63, signalling upside risk potential of 43.97%. On the other hand Core Laboratories has an analysts' consensus of $18.50 which suggests that it could grow by 20.68%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than Core Laboratories, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than Core Laboratories.

ProPetro Holding has a beta of 2.028, which suggesting that the stock is 102.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Core Laboratories has a beta of 2.382, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 138.225%.

ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Core Laboratories offers a yield of 0.26% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories pays out 5.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Core Laboratories's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $320.6M, which are larger than Core Laboratories quarterly revenues of $129.2M. ProPetro Holding's net income of -$17.1M is lower than Core Laboratories's net income of $7.4M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while Core Laboratories's PE ratio is 23.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.54x versus 1.40x for Core Laboratories. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Halliburton has a net margin of -5.32% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of 10.96%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -14.92% beat Halliburton's return on equity of 24.98%.

ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $10.63, signalling upside risk potential of 43.97%. On the other hand Halliburton has an analysts' consensus of $34.16 which suggests that it could grow by 36.24%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than Halliburton, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than Halliburton.

ProPetro Holding has a beta of 2.028, which suggesting that the stock is 102.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Halliburton has a beta of 1.849, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.903%.

ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Halliburton offers a yield of 2.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton pays out 23.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Halliburton's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $320.6M, which are smaller than Halliburton quarterly revenues of $5.6B. ProPetro Holding's net income of -$17.1M is lower than Halliburton's net income of $615M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while Halliburton's PE ratio is 8.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.54x versus 0.96x for Halliburton. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kinder Morgan has a net margin of -5.32% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of 16.73%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -14.92% beat Kinder Morgan's return on equity of 8.23%.

ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $10.63, signalling upside risk potential of 43.97%. On the other hand Kinder Morgan has an analysts' consensus of $30.35 which suggests that it could grow by 6.99%. Given that ProPetro Holding has higher upside potential than Kinder Morgan, analysts believe ProPetro Holding is more attractive than Kinder Morgan.

ProPetro Holding has a beta of 2.028, which suggesting that the stock is 102.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kinder Morgan has a beta of 0.936, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.412%.

ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kinder Morgan offers a yield of 4.05% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.29 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan pays out 97.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Kinder Morgan's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $320.6M, which are smaller than Kinder Morgan quarterly revenues of $4B. ProPetro Holding's net income of -$17.1M is lower than Kinder Morgan's net income of $667M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while Kinder Morgan's PE ratio is 24.25x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.54x versus 4.17x for Kinder Morgan. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

US Energy has a net margin of -5.32% compared to ProPetro Holding's net margin of -284.64%. ProPetro Holding's return on equity of -14.92% beat US Energy's return on equity of -71.41%.

ProPetro Holding has a consensus price target of $10.63, signalling upside risk potential of 43.97%. On the other hand US Energy has an analysts' consensus of $2.92 which suggests that it could grow by 133.33%. Given that US Energy has higher upside potential than ProPetro Holding, analysts believe US Energy is more attractive than ProPetro Holding.

ProPetro Holding has a beta of 2.028, which suggesting that the stock is 102.834% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison US Energy has a beta of 0.690, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.014%.

ProPetro Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. US Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. ProPetro Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. US Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

ProPetro Holding quarterly revenues are $320.6M, which are larger than US Energy quarterly revenues of $4.2M. ProPetro Holding's net income of -$17.1M is lower than US Energy's net income of -$12M. Notably, ProPetro Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.47x while US Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ProPetro Holding is 0.54x versus 1.62x for US Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.