PROP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Chord Energy has a net margin of -150.36% compared to Prairie Operating's net margin of 14.48%. Prairie Operating's return on equity of -89.94% beat Chord Energy's return on equity of 11.63%.

Prairie Operating has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Chord Energy has an analysts' consensus of $154.63 which suggests that it could grow by 36.19%. Given that Chord Energy has higher upside potential than Prairie Operating, analysts believe Chord Energy is more attractive than Prairie Operating.

Prairie Operating has a beta of 1.989, which suggesting that the stock is 98.905% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chord Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Prairie Operating has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Chord Energy offers a yield of 7.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.30 per share. Prairie Operating pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Chord Energy pays out 62.44% of its earnings as a dividend. Chord Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prairie Operating quarterly revenues are $7.9M, which are smaller than Chord Energy quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Prairie Operating's net income of -$11.9M is lower than Chord Energy's net income of $210.6M. Notably, Prairie Operating's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Chord Energy's PE ratio is 7.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prairie Operating is -- versus 1.14x for Chord Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

HighPeak Energy has a net margin of -150.36% compared to Prairie Operating's net margin of 3.83%. Prairie Operating's return on equity of -89.94% beat HighPeak Energy's return on equity of 6.03%.

Prairie Operating has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand HighPeak Energy has an analysts' consensus of $22.25 which suggests that it could grow by 71.55%. Given that HighPeak Energy has higher upside potential than Prairie Operating, analysts believe HighPeak Energy is more attractive than Prairie Operating.

Prairie Operating has a beta of 1.989, which suggesting that the stock is 98.905% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison HighPeak Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Prairie Operating has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. HighPeak Energy offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Prairie Operating pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. HighPeak Energy pays out 23.34% of its earnings as a dividend. HighPeak Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Prairie Operating quarterly revenues are $7.9M, which are smaller than HighPeak Energy quarterly revenues of $234.8M. Prairie Operating's net income of -$11.9M is lower than HighPeak Energy's net income of $9M. Notably, Prairie Operating's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while HighPeak Energy's PE ratio is 19.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prairie Operating is -- versus 1.56x for HighPeak Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Centrus Energy has a net margin of -150.36% compared to Prairie Operating's net margin of 35.42%. Prairie Operating's return on equity of -89.94% beat Centrus Energy's return on equity of 96.19%.

Prairie Operating has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Centrus Energy has an analysts' consensus of $141.74 which suggests that it could grow by 124.95%. Given that Centrus Energy has higher upside potential than Prairie Operating, analysts believe Centrus Energy is more attractive than Prairie Operating.

Prairie Operating has a beta of 1.989, which suggesting that the stock is 98.905% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Centrus Energy has a beta of 1.256, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.553%.

Prairie Operating has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Centrus Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prairie Operating pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Centrus Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Prairie Operating quarterly revenues are $7.9M, which are smaller than Centrus Energy quarterly revenues of $151.6M. Prairie Operating's net income of -$11.9M is lower than Centrus Energy's net income of $53.7M. Notably, Prairie Operating's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Centrus Energy's PE ratio is 14.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prairie Operating is -- versus 2.33x for Centrus Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

New Era Helium has a net margin of -150.36% compared to Prairie Operating's net margin of --. Prairie Operating's return on equity of -89.94% beat New Era Helium's return on equity of --.

Prairie Operating has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand New Era Helium has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Prairie Operating has higher upside potential than New Era Helium, analysts believe Prairie Operating is more attractive than New Era Helium.

Prairie Operating has a beta of 1.989, which suggesting that the stock is 98.905% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison New Era Helium has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Prairie Operating has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. New Era Helium offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Prairie Operating pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. New Era Helium pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Prairie Operating quarterly revenues are $7.9M, which are larger than New Era Helium quarterly revenues of --. Prairie Operating's net income of -$11.9M is higher than New Era Helium's net income of --. Notably, Prairie Operating's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while New Era Helium's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Prairie Operating is -- versus -- for New Era Helium. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.