YGMZ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CBAK Energy Technology has a net margin of -- compared to MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net margin of 0.04%. MingZhu Logistics Holdings's return on equity of -- beat CBAK Energy Technology's return on equity of 9.43%.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CBAK Energy Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 103.13%. Given that CBAK Energy Technology has higher upside potential than MingZhu Logistics Holdings, analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology is more attractive than MingZhu Logistics Holdings.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 1.742, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.216%.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CBAK Energy Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MingZhu Logistics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CBAK Energy Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CBAK Energy Technology quarterly revenues of $44.6M. MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net income of -- is lower than CBAK Energy Technology's net income of $17.7K. Notably, MingZhu Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CBAK Energy Technology's PE ratio is 8.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MingZhu Logistics Holdings is 0.06x versus 0.43x for CBAK Energy Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EHang Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net margin of -37.51%. MingZhu Logistics Holdings's return on equity of -- beat EHang Holdings's return on equity of -61.77%.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EHang Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $24.29 which suggests that it could grow by 57.5%. Given that EHang Holdings has higher upside potential than MingZhu Logistics Holdings, analysts believe EHang Holdings is more attractive than MingZhu Logistics Holdings.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EHang Holdings has a beta of 0.940, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.982%.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EHang Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MingZhu Logistics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EHang Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than EHang Holdings quarterly revenues of $17.9M. MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net income of -- is lower than EHang Holdings's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, MingZhu Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EHang Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MingZhu Logistics Holdings is 0.06x versus 20.70x for EHang Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sunrise New Energy has a net margin of -- compared to MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net margin of --. MingZhu Logistics Holdings's return on equity of -- beat Sunrise New Energy's return on equity of -47.67%.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Sunrise New Energy has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MingZhu Logistics Holdings has higher upside potential than Sunrise New Energy, analysts believe MingZhu Logistics Holdings is more attractive than Sunrise New Energy.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sunrise New Energy has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sunrise New Energy offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MingZhu Logistics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sunrise New Energy pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Sunrise New Energy quarterly revenues of --. MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net income of -- is lower than Sunrise New Energy's net income of --. Notably, MingZhu Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sunrise New Energy's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MingZhu Logistics Holdings is 0.06x versus 0.49x for Sunrise New Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a net margin of -- compared to MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net margin of --. MingZhu Logistics Holdings's return on equity of -- beat NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's return on equity of 8.22%.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1285.08%. Given that NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has higher upside potential than MingZhu Logistics Holdings, analysts believe NiSun International Enterprise Development Group is more attractive than MingZhu Logistics Holdings.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.603%.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MingZhu Logistics Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group quarterly revenues of --. MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net income of -- is lower than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's net income of --. Notably, MingZhu Logistics Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's PE ratio is 1.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MingZhu Logistics Holdings is 0.06x versus 0.06x for NiSun International Enterprise Development Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.