EPOW Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CBAK Energy Technology has a net margin of -- compared to Sunrise New Energy's net margin of 0.04%. Sunrise New Energy's return on equity of -47.67% beat CBAK Energy Technology's return on equity of 9.43%.

Sunrise New Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand CBAK Energy Technology has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 92.31%. Given that CBAK Energy Technology has higher upside potential than Sunrise New Energy, analysts believe CBAK Energy Technology is more attractive than Sunrise New Energy.

Sunrise New Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CBAK Energy Technology has a beta of 1.742, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 74.216%.

Sunrise New Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CBAK Energy Technology offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sunrise New Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CBAK Energy Technology pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sunrise New Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than CBAK Energy Technology quarterly revenues of $44.6M. Sunrise New Energy's net income of -- is lower than CBAK Energy Technology's net income of $17.7K. Notably, Sunrise New Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CBAK Energy Technology's PE ratio is 8.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sunrise New Energy is 0.53x versus 0.45x for CBAK Energy Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

EHang Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Sunrise New Energy's net margin of -37.51%. Sunrise New Energy's return on equity of -47.67% beat EHang Holdings's return on equity of -61.77%.

Sunrise New Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand EHang Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $24.29 which suggests that it could grow by 51.89%. Given that EHang Holdings has higher upside potential than Sunrise New Energy, analysts believe EHang Holdings is more attractive than Sunrise New Energy.

Sunrise New Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EHang Holdings has a beta of 0.940, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.982%.

Sunrise New Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EHang Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sunrise New Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EHang Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sunrise New Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than EHang Holdings quarterly revenues of $17.9M. Sunrise New Energy's net income of -- is lower than EHang Holdings's net income of -$6.7M. Notably, Sunrise New Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while EHang Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sunrise New Energy is 0.53x versus 21.46x for EHang Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a net margin of -- compared to Sunrise New Energy's net margin of --. Sunrise New Energy's return on equity of -47.67% beat NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's return on equity of 8.22%.

Sunrise New Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1365.38%. Given that NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has higher upside potential than Sunrise New Energy, analysts believe NiSun International Enterprise Development Group is more attractive than Sunrise New Energy.

Sunrise New Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NiSun International Enterprise Development Group has a beta of 1.266, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.603%.

Sunrise New Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sunrise New Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NiSun International Enterprise Development Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sunrise New Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group quarterly revenues of --. Sunrise New Energy's net income of -- is lower than NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's net income of --. Notably, Sunrise New Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NiSun International Enterprise Development Group's PE ratio is 1.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sunrise New Energy is 0.53x versus 0.05x for NiSun International Enterprise Development Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a net margin of -- compared to Sunrise New Energy's net margin of --. Sunrise New Energy's return on equity of -47.67% beat MingZhu Logistics Holdings's return on equity of --.

Sunrise New Energy has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MingZhu Logistics Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sunrise New Energy has higher upside potential than MingZhu Logistics Holdings, analysts believe Sunrise New Energy is more attractive than MingZhu Logistics Holdings.

Sunrise New Energy has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MingZhu Logistics Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Sunrise New Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MingZhu Logistics Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sunrise New Energy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MingZhu Logistics Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sunrise New Energy quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than MingZhu Logistics Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Sunrise New Energy's net income of -- is lower than MingZhu Logistics Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Sunrise New Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MingZhu Logistics Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sunrise New Energy is 0.53x versus 0.06x for MingZhu Logistics Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.